BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai217Pune212Chennai207Ahmedabad205Jaipur146Kolkata107Delhi99Bangalore69Hyderabad60Surat39Lucknow26Chandigarh26Nagpur22Amritsar16Indore15Rajkot14Visakhapatnam8Agra7Jabalpur6Jodhpur6Panaji5Raipur4Cuttack4Allahabad3Cochin3Ranchi3Calcutta3SC2Guwahati2Varanasi1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 12A50Exemption16Section 80G15Section 80G(5)14Natural Justice9Section 80G(5)(ii)8Section 80G(5)(iii)7Section 2(15)6Limitation/Time-bar

BHAI DAYA SINGH JI BHAI HIMMAT SINGH JI NISHKAM SATSANG SABHA THROUGH ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE,LUDHIANA, PUNJAB vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Accordingly. 22. In the combined result, both appeals (ITA No.728 & 732/SRT/2023) are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 258/ASR/2025[2025-2026]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Aug 2025AY 2025-2026

Bench: Sh. Udayan Das Gupta & Sh. Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

condone the delay in filing the Form No.10AB, u/s 80G(5) of the Act. The Tribunal is a final fact finding authority, and based on the assessee`s facts and undue hardship created by the clause (iii) of 3rd proviso of section

BHAI DAYA SINGH JI BHAI DHARAM SINGH JI NISHKAM SATSANG SABHA,LUDHIANA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Accordingly. 22. In the combined result, both appeals (ITA No.728 & 732/SRT/2023) are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

4
Condonation of Delay4
Charitable Trust4
Section 143(2)2
ITA 257/ASR/2025[2025-2026]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Aug 2025AY 2025-2026

Bench: Sh. Udayan Das Gupta & Sh. Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

condone the delay in filing the Form No.10AB, u/s 80G(5) of the Act. The Tribunal is a final fact finding authority, and based on the assessee`s facts and undue hardship created by the clause (iii) of 3rd proviso of section

BAHADUR KE TEXTILES & KNITWEAR ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 86/ASR/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 25

condone the delay and admit the appeals on merits. 16. At the time of hearing, the Ld. Counsel invited our attention to para 2 of the order of CIT(E), dated 31.07.2018, wherein the Ld. CIT(E) had ITA Nos. 501 & 86/Asr/2019&2020 10 Bahadur Ke Textiles & Knitwear Association v. CIT discussed aims and objects of the company

BAHUDER KE TEXTILES AND KNITWEARS ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION ) , CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 501/ASR/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 25

condone the delay and admit the appeals on merits. 16. At the time of hearing, the Ld. Counsel invited our attention to para 2 of the order of CIT(E), dated 31.07.2018, wherein the Ld. CIT(E) had ITA Nos. 501 & 86/Asr/2019&2020 10 Bahadur Ke Textiles & Knitwear Association v. CIT discussed aims and objects of the company

SANT BABA BODHA NANAD GAUSHALLA COMMITTEE,MANSA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 257/ASR/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Aug 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2023-24] Sant Baba Bodha Nand Gaushalla The Cit(Exemptions), Chandigarh, Committee/Aop (Trust) C/O-J. K. Aayakar Bhawan, Sector-17-E, Gupta, Advocate 4702, Hospital Vs Chandigarh-160017 Bazar, Bathinda, (Punjab)-151005 Pan-Aaits0667H Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri J. K. Gupta, Adv Respondent By Sh. M.S. Nethrapal, Cit-Dr

Section 10Section 5Section 80GSection 80G(5)

condoning the delay, if such provision is provided in the Act while considering any issue for adjudication. Therefore, considering the above proposition, we are of the view that ld. CIT (Exemption) has rightly rejected the application of the assessee for grant of approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act. All these three appeals are rejected

HEMOPHILLA SOCIETY OF KASHMIR,SRINAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, this appeal against the rejection for registration u/s 80G(5), is also

ITA 209/ASR/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Apr 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Mohd. Iqbal Untoo, C. A
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

condone the delay and admit the appeal to be decided on merits. 3. Grounds of appeal taken by the assesseee in Form No. 36 are as follows: “1. The Ld. CIT (E) has erred in rejecting the registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act in an arbitrary manner. 2. The Ld. CIT (E) has erred in not giving

M/S. NOBAL WELFARE SOCITY ,FAZILKA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 233/ASR/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Sept 2023AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AR
Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)

delay of 266 days is condoned, and appeals admitted on merits. Nobel Welfare Society v. CIT 3. The CIT (Exemption) while rejecting the application for registration/approval has stated that on the stipulated date of hearing neither any submission was made nor was any request for adjournment or other communication received from the applicant through any channel. Another letter granting

M/S. NOBAL WELFARE SOCIETY,FAZILKA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 234/ASR/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Sept 2023AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, AR
Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)

delay of 266 days is condoned, and appeals admitted on merits. Nobel Welfare Society v. CIT 3. The CIT (Exemption) while rejecting the application for registration/approval has stated that on the stipulated date of hearing neither any submission was made nor was any request for adjournment or other communication received from the applicant through any channel. Another letter granting

SHARAN FOUNDATION,MOGA, PUNJAB vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 254/ASR/2024[2021-22]Status: HeardITAT Amritsar13 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Nikhil Goyal, Adv., &
Section 282Section 80Section 80G(5)(iii)

80G(5)(iii) of the Act 61, in absence of any response to various notices issued by the 2 I.T.A. No.254/Asr/2024 Sharan Foundation v. CIT (E) ld CIT (E), for verification of the genuineness of the activities and fulfilment of all conditions laid down under clause (i) to (v) of the section. 2. Condonation of delay

PARDHAN ACHARYA PUJYA SHRI SOHAN LAL JAIN SAMARAK SAMITI,AMRITSAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 603/ASR/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2024-2025

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 603/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2024-25

Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)

section 80G (5) (ii) of the Income Tax Act (In short ‘the Act’). 2. None attended for the assessee. However, after hearing the Ld. CIT (DR) and going through the written submission dated 05.08.2025 filed by the assessee, we find that there was short delay of 35 days and 38 days in the ITA Nos. 603/Asr/2024 and 604/Asr/2024 respectively

BHABRIANI SAMADH BABA VERA JI WELFARE SOCIETY,AMRITSAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 604/ASR/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2024-2025

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 603/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2024-25

Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)

section 80G (5) (ii) of the Income Tax Act (In short ‘the Act’). 2. None attended for the assessee. However, after hearing the Ld. CIT (DR) and going through the written submission dated 05.08.2025 filed by the assessee, we find that there was short delay of 35 days and 38 days in the ITA Nos. 603/Asr/2024 and 604/Asr/2024 respectively

GURU TEG BAHADUR EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 264/ASR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar14 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. K. Bhagat, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. R. Kaushik, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 5

delay is hereby condoned and appeal is admitted on merits. 5. The CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh vide order dated 26.03.2018 rejected the assesse application for registration u/s 12A. Aggrieved by the order of the department, the applicant filed an appeal before the Hon’ble ITAT, Amritsar. However, the Hon’ble ITAT has allowed the appeal of the assessee

SHRI HAR HAR MAHADEV SEWA MANDAL,MANSA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 79/ASR/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar01 Aug 2023AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

section 80G (5) of the Act. But the assessee was granted provisional registration u/s 12AA of the Act. The assessee made application for grant of final registration after receiving the provisional registration. But the final registration was duly rejected by the ld. CIT(E) and passed the ex parte order accordingly. Being aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

SHRI GAUSHALA BHAWAN CHARITABLE TRUST,MANSA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 80/ASR/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar01 Aug 2023AY 2023-24

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

section 80G (5) of the Act. But the assessee was granted provisional registration u/s 12AA of the Act. The assessee made application for grant of final registration after receiving the provisional registration. But the final registration was duly rejected by the ld. CIT(E) and passed the ex parte order accordingly. Being aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

SHRI GAUSHALA BHAWAN CHARITABLE TRUST,MANSA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 81/ASR/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar01 Aug 2023AY 2023-24

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

section 80G (5) of the Act. But the assessee was granted provisional registration u/s 12AA of the Act. The assessee made application for grant of final registration after receiving the provisional registration. But the final registration was duly rejected by the ld. CIT(E) and passed the ex parte order accordingly. Being aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before

SHRI HAR HAR MAHADEV SEWA MANDAL ,MANSA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 78/ASR/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar01 Aug 2023AY 2023-24

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

section 80G (5) of the Act. But the assessee was granted provisional registration u/s 12AA of the Act. The assessee made application for grant of final registration after receiving the provisional registration. But the final registration was duly rejected by the ld. CIT(E) and passed the ex parte order accordingly. Being aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before