Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune28 Karnataka21 Jaipur21 Mumbai18 Kolkata17 Delhi17 Chennai13 Ahmedabad12 Bangalore12 Visakhapatnam7 Hyderabad7 Rajkot6 Cochin6 Nagpur5 Amritsar4 Agra3 Surat3 Indore3 Raipur2 Guwahati1 SC1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 26316 Section 271D14 Section 269S12 Penalty4 Condonation of Delay4 Section 2502

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 40/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR

Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

section 263 which was neither in the knowledge of the assessee or in the knowledge of its counsel Mr. Mahesh Chander Khungar, Adv. which consequently resulted in delay of 967 days in filing the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. He contended that the issue has been pointed out to the appellant by his newly appointed counsel Mr. Anil

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

SURJIT SINGH 29-D GURU MAR DASS AVENUE AJNALA ROAD AMRITSAR,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1) AMRITSAR INCOEM TAX OFFICE AAYKAR BHAWAN MAQBOOL ROAD AMRITSAR, AMRITSAR

SURJIT SINGH 29-D GURU AMAR DASS AVENUE AJANALA ROAD AMRITSAR,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1) AMRITSAR INCOME TAX OFFICE AAYKAR BHAWAN MAQBOOL ROAD AMRITSAR, AMRITSAR