BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 270A(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai97Chandigarh63Chennai57Ahmedabad56Jaipur46Pune39Delhi36Bangalore31Hyderabad28Lucknow24Cochin23Kolkata20Patna20Visakhapatnam17Indore16Surat14Rajkot11Raipur10Nagpur9Cuttack8Jabalpur5Agra3Amritsar2Allahabad2Panaji2Dehradun2Guwahati2Jodhpur2Varanasi1Ranchi1SC1

Key Topics

Section 270A5Section 2503Penalty2Addition to Income2Condonation of Delay2

SUMAN CHHABRA,JAMMU AND KASHMIR vs. WARD 1(1), JAMMU, JAMMU AND KASHMIR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 191/ASR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 191/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18

Section 147Section 250Section 270A

section 270A. 5. That the appellant craves leave to add, alter or amend any ground of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing.” 4. The brief facts emerging from records are that the assessee has filed his return declaring a total income of Rs. 3,40,490/- and on the basis of information gathered

RAMEEZ RAJA BHAT,BUGAM BATAPORA CHADOORA BUDGAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 SRINAGAR, SILK FACTORY ROAD RAJBAGH SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 198/ASR/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
10 Nov 2025
AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: None (Written submission)
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 69A

270A and u/s 271AAC (1) both dated 4th February, 2025, has been served on him physically (a copy of which is attached with the application) by the employee of the verification unit. Thereafter, he appointed his CA, who assisted him in filing this appeal on 4th March, 2025, which is belated by 338 days. He prayed for condonation of delay