Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 270A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 270A5 Section 2503 Penalty2 Addition to Income2 Condonation of Delay2

SUMAN CHHABRA,JAMMU AND KASHMIR vs. WARD 1(1), JAMMU, JAMMU AND KASHMIR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 191/ASR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 191/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18

Section 147Section 250Section 270A

270A in imposing a penalty of Rs. 1232082/- and dismissing the appeal in limine without adjudicating the case on merits. 2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law by not condoning the delay of 169 days, despite the assessee's mental distress during the period. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) erred

RAMEEZ RAJA BHAT,BUGAM BATAPORA CHADOORA BUDGAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 SRINAGAR, SILK FACTORY ROAD RAJBAGH SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes