BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 270A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai108Chennai83Chandigarh67Ahmedabad63Pune57Jaipur50Delhi43Bangalore33Hyderabad28Lucknow27Cochin25Kolkata25Patna22Indore19Visakhapatnam17Surat16Rajkot12Raipur10Cuttack10Nagpur9Jabalpur5Dehradun4Agra3Allahabad2Amritsar2Panaji2Guwahati2Jodhpur2Varanasi1Ranchi1SC1

Key Topics

Section 270A5Section 2503Penalty2Addition to Income2Condonation of Delay2

SUMAN CHHABRA,JAMMU AND KASHMIR vs. WARD 1(1), JAMMU, JAMMU AND KASHMIR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 191/ASR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 191/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18

Section 147Section 250Section 270A

1. The CIT(A) NFAC has erred in law and in facts in confirming the penalty order passed by the AO u/s 270A in imposing a penalty of Rs. 1232082/- and dismissing the appeal in limine without adjudicating the case on merits. 2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred

RAMEEZ RAJA BHAT,BUGAM BATAPORA CHADOORA BUDGAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 SRINAGAR, SILK FACTORY ROAD RAJBAGH SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 198/ASR/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
10 Nov 2025
AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: None (Written submission)
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 69A

270A and u/s 271AAC (1) both dated 4th February, 2025, has been served on him physically (a copy of which is attached with the application) by the employee of the verification unit. Thereafter, he appointed his CA, who assisted him in filing this appeal on 4th March, 2025, which is belated by 338 days. He prayed for condonation of delay