BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 221(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai184Karnataka105Delhi72Mumbai53Kolkata35Bangalore31Pune29Jaipur27Cochin26Hyderabad24Lucknow17Ahmedabad17Surat14Chandigarh9Cuttack8Raipur6Indore6Guwahati5Amritsar4Allahabad4Visakhapatnam3Rajkot3SC2Agra2Dehradun1Calcutta1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1Panaji1Jodhpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 25021Section 2213TDS3Section 1482

AMANDIP SIINGH,HOUSE NO. NEAR NEHAR PATTI vs. ITO WARD 1, TARN TARAN, ITO WARD , TARN TARAN SARHALI ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 414/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2013-14]

Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 221(1)Section 250

221(1) dated 5.7.2024 from Jurisdictional AO showing various demands outstanding against the assessee. 9. Thereafter the assessee approached the undersigned to look Into the matter and after searching the portal of the assessee It came to notice that CIT(A) had passed ex-parte order dismissing the appeal of the assessee. 10. That since the order passed

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY ,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS) , SRINAGAR

ITA 107/ASR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 221Section 250

221 has been issued as on 23.01.2023 wherein you were required to furnish the proof of payment of outstanding demand especially late filing fee in my office AAYAKAR BHAWAN ROOM NO 208 Near GOVT SIK FACTORY RAJBAGH SRINAGAR as on 30.01.2023. The DDO thereafter raised the matter with his counsel that the appeal has been dismissed

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY ,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

ITA 108/ASR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 221Section 250

221 has been issued as on 23.01.2023 wherein you were required to furnish the proof of payment of outstanding demand especially late filing fee in my office AAYAKAR BHAWAN ROOM NO 208 Near GOVT SIK FACTORY RAJBAGH SRINAGAR as on 30.01.2023. The DDO thereafter raised the matter with his counsel that the appeal has been dismissed

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

ITA 109/ASR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 221Section 250

221 has been issued as on 23.01.2023 wherein you were required to furnish the proof of payment of outstanding demand especially late filing fee in my office AAYAKAR BHAWAN ROOM NO 208 Near GOVT SIK FACTORY RAJBAGH SRINAGAR as on 30.01.2023. The DDO thereafter raised the matter with his counsel that the appeal has been dismissed