Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 208clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 25016 Section 104 Section 2213 TDS3 Section 143(1)2 Section 1442 Condonation of Delay2

M/S JULLUNDER MODEL SCHOOL KMV MARG,JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is, therefore, allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 82/ASR/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Us By The Ld.Counsel For The Assessee Seeking Condonation Of The Delay. The Contents Of The Same Read As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Y.K.Sud, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Prabh Jot Kaur, CIT

Section 10Section 143(1)

condone the delay. The order was pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on 11.0.2021. 7. On merits the Ld.Counsel for the assessee contended that since it had applied for grant of approval of registration w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, and the Ld.CIT(E) had granted the same w.e.f. assessment year 2018-19, without assigning any reason

M/S JULLUNDER MODEL SCHOOL KMV MARG,JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

ABDUL MAJID WARD NO 6 MOHALLA RADIO STATSION HAVELI POONCH ,POONCH vs. ROMESH KUMAR SHARMA INCOME TAX OFFICER JAMMU, JAMMU

M/S JULLUNDER MODEL SCHOOL KMV MARG,JALANDHAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

ABDUL MAJID WARD NO 6 MOHALLA RADIO STATSION HAVELI POONCH ,POONCH vs. ROMESH KUMAR SHARMA INCOME TAX OFFICER JAMMU, JAMMU

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY ,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS) , SRINAGAR

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY ,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR