Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 194C6 Section 2643 Section 2493 Section 53 Section 1563 TDS3 Limitation/Time-bar3 Condonation of Delay3 Revision u/s 263

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1`, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals filed are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 644/ASR/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 156Section 194CSection 249Section 264Section 5

1. That the learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate the facts of that there was a sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal before him from 01.04.2014 to 17.07.2014 and the same may please be condoned and appeal may please be heard on merits. 2. That the Assessing Officer has legally erred in law and facts for treating

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1`, JALANDHAR

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - TDS-1, JALANDHAR

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1`, JALANDHAR

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - TDS-1, JALANDHAR

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1, JALANDHAR

M/S. NORTHERN STEEL INDUSTRIES,,SRINAGAR (KMR) vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, SRINAGAR (J&K)