BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 191clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna151Chennai107Karnataka105Nagpur94Mumbai71Pune65Delhi64Bangalore58Cochin40Jaipur33Kolkata30Visakhapatnam16Ahmedabad13Lucknow13Chandigarh13Hyderabad12Rajkot10Agra8Indore6Varanasi5Guwahati5Surat5Panaji4Allahabad3SC3Rajasthan2Cuttack2Raipur2Amritsar2Punjab & Haryana1Dehradun1Calcutta1Andhra Pradesh1Jodhpur1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 682Section 1482Addition to Income2

SMT. HARVINDER KAUR,KAPURTHALA vs. A.C.I.T, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I,, JALANDHAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 328/ASR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Oct 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi. T. A. No. 328/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Surinder Mahajan (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alok Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

191 (SC); CIT v. R. Venkata Swamy Naidu [1956] 29 ITR 529 (SC)]. There is, accordingly, on the basis of the material on record, nothing amiss in the impugned disallowance. So, however, and only in the interest of justice, we consider it proper to restore the matter back to the file of the AO to allow a final opportunity

SH. FARUKH JEHAN ZEB ,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ANANT NAG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 444/ASR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar03 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Touseef Ahmad Khanday &For Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 68

delay of 8 days in filing the appeal has been 3 Farukh Ahmad Zeb v. ITO condoned on oral request mad by the Ld. AR at the time of hearing and appeal admitted for hearing on merits. 3. Briefly the facts as per record are that the AO received STR information from Chief Manager J&K Bank Ltd., Pampore which