Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 168clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 2634 Section 271(1)2 Section 1472 Section 1682 Penalty2 Condonation of Delay2

ESTATE OF SH. JAGIR SINGH BHULLAR,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TARN TARAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 306/ASR/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.K. Choudhry, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.306/Asr/2014 & 591/Asr/2015 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2007-08) Estate Of Sh. Jagir Singh Bhullar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Through S. Jasbir—Singh Ward-1(3), Bhullar, Tarn Taran, E-250 Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar, Punjab. Punjab.

For Appellant: Sh. Padam Bahl, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass , DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 168Section 263Section 271(1)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. First we shall take assessee`s appeal in ITA No. 306/ASR/2014, for A.Y.2007-08.The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in ITA No. 306/ASR/2014 are as follows: “1. That the Assessment Order passed by Ld. Assessing Officer u/s. 143(3)/147 of the Income- tax Act, 1961, as well

ESTATE OF SH. JAGIR SINGH BHULLAR,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TARN TARAN

ESTATE OF SH. JAGIR SINGH BHULLAR,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TARN TARAN

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TARN TARAN vs. ESTATE OF LATE SH. JAGIR SINGH BHULLAR, TARN TARAN