BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

50 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 154(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna471Mumbai439Delhi418Chennai355Bangalore253Pune240Kolkata171Karnataka131Ahmedabad122Hyderabad112Nagpur109Chandigarh93Jaipur92Visakhapatnam69Surat61Indore57Cochin53Amritsar50Lucknow45Calcutta36Raipur28Rajkot22Guwahati21Cuttack21Agra20Jodhpur12Allahabad10SC9Jabalpur9Panaji6Ranchi5Telangana4Varanasi4Dehradun2Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 153A54Section 15443Section 26340Section 14427Section 12A24Section 143(1)16Section 25013Section 1489Rectification u/s 154

SMT. RAJINDER KAUR,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, DASUYA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 171/ASR/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Surinder Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. R. Kaushik, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263

Section 5 of the Limitation Act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice. It held that in every case of delay there can be some lapse on the part of the litigant concerned, but that alone is not enough to turn down his plea and to shut the door against him; and if the explanation does

BAHADUR KE TEXTILES & KNITWEAR ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Showing 1–20 of 50 · Page 1 of 3

9
Condonation of Delay7
Addition to Income6
Exemption4

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 86/ASR/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 25

condone the delay and admit the appeals on merits. 16. At the time of hearing, the Ld. Counsel invited our attention to para 2 of the order of CIT(E), dated 31.07.2018, wherein the Ld. CIT(E) had ITA Nos. 501 & 86/Asr/2019&2020 10 Bahadur Ke Textiles & Knitwear Association v. CIT discussed aims and objects of the company

BAHUDER KE TEXTILES AND KNITWEARS ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION ) , CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 501/ASR/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 25

condone the delay and admit the appeals on merits. 16. At the time of hearing, the Ld. Counsel invited our attention to para 2 of the order of CIT(E), dated 31.07.2018, wherein the Ld. CIT(E) had ITA Nos. 501 & 86/Asr/2019&2020 10 Bahadur Ke Textiles & Knitwear Association v. CIT discussed aims and objects of the company

VOLUNTARY MEDCARE SOCIETY,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS) WARD , JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee ITA No

ITA 262/ASR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(b)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

condoned by the CBDT on this Circular. 4. The ld. AR relied on the section 12A(1)(b) and he mentioned that it is pertinent to mention that section 12A(1)(b) as applicable for assessment year 2018- 19 requires the assessee to get the accounts audited by an accountant as defined under section (2) of section 288 and file

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 40/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

delay of 967 days in filing these appeals is hereby condoned and appeals are admitted to be heard on merits. 5. The ld. Pr. CIT has observed that during the course of assessment proceedings in the case of M/s Tirath Ram Badri Nath, Abohar in respect of AY 2008-09, AO has noted that the appellant Sh. Manjit Krishan Malhotra

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 39/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

delay of 967 days in filing these appeals is hereby condoned and appeals are admitted to be heard on merits. 5. The ld. Pr. CIT has observed that during the course of assessment proceedings in the case of M/s Tirath Ram Badri Nath, Abohar in respect of AY 2008-09, AO has noted that the appellant Sh. Manjit Krishan Malhotra

AMANDIP SIINGH,HOUSE NO. NEAR NEHAR PATTI vs. ITO WARD 1, TARN TARAN, ITO WARD , TARN TARAN SARHALI ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 414/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2013-14]

Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 221(1)Section 250

154 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) dated 14.07.2022. 2. There is a delay of 183 days in filing the appeal before us. The assessee has filed a condonation application, which is reproduced as under:- “Regarding: Application for condonation of delay in the filing of appeal in the case of Amandip Singh

INDU MAHAJAN,AMRITSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAX CIRCLE-5 , AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing no

ITA 243/ASR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar08 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250oSection 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condoned. 4. The brief fact of case is that the assessee has filed return u/s 139(1) for the impugned assessment year. By passing the audit report of the assessee the return was processed by CPC u/s 143(1) and the disallowance was made for late deposit of contribution made in respect of PF & ESI u/s 36 (1

SHRI KAILASH CHAND (PROP) M.K. STEELS,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal is decided in the terms indicated as above

ITA 170/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar02 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Sh. Anupam K. Garg, CIT(DR)
Section 143Section 14ASection 154

delay of 3 days in filing this appeal is hereby condoned. 4. We have heard the learned CIT(DR), perusing the impugned order and written submissions filed by the assessee on record. Admittedly, the AO has passed order under section 143 3 of the income tax act 1961 by invoking provisions of section 14A read with rule

JAMMU AND KASHMIR PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED,SRINAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 4/ASR/2020[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 139Section 154Section 250(6)

1. On the facts and circumstances, the ld. Commissioner of Appeals was not right in upholding the AO’s action of denying the rectification under section 154 and to allow a claim of Rs.63,72,588/- made by the assessee in the revised return.” 2. Assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay

TORRENT ROOFING SYSTEMS,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -4, `HOSHIARPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 145/ASR/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Dec 2022AY 2017-2018

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Ratinder Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80I

section 143(1) i.e., original order passed on 05.12.2018 continues where CPC Bengaluru had denied deduction under Chapter Vl-A. Order u/s.154 does not propose a further change in income from one which was determined while passing order u/s. 143(1). 5. In the grounds, the appellant assessee has raised objection to the action of the ld. CIT(A) containing

SHRI AMRIT PARKASH SEHGAL (HUF),JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 12/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Surinder Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263

section 263 of the Act was not appealable before this Tribunal since he was not advised by his Tax Consultant about this legal right. Later on, when a Senior Lawyer advised assessee to file an appeal, the assessee immediately took steps to file the appeal. Therefore, the delay caused. We note that delay was because of the wrong advice

MEASAGE GRAM SEWA AND VIKLANG SHAYTA SANSTHA REGD,BATHINDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in the terms indicated as above

ITA 619/ASR/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar02 Mar 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. K. R. Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Satbir Singh, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 4

154 of the Act. Therefore, the AR argued that in the light of the provisions of Sections 139(5) and 139(9) of the Act, to remove defects in the return and so the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 4 Assessment Year: 2016-17 11 of the Act. Even otherwise, the AO had powers to condone the delay

PRANAY MAHAJAN WELFARE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2(1), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 460/ASR/2024[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2022-2023

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: None (Adjournment application)
Section 143(1)Section 250

condone the same, and we are in agreement with the view taken by the ld. first appellate authority. 7. As such, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. I.T.A. No. 458/Asr/2024 for A.Y. 2015-16: 8. In this appeal filed by the assessee, the facts are identical to ITA No. 457/Asr/2024 with the only exception that the delay in filing

PRANAY MAHAJAN WELFARE TRUST,MEDICAL ENCLAVE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2(1), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 457/ASR/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: None (Adjournment application)
Section 143(1)Section 250

condone the same, and we are in agreement with the view taken by the ld. first appellate authority. 7. As such, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. I.T.A. No. 458/Asr/2024 for A.Y. 2015-16: 8. In this appeal filed by the assessee, the facts are identical to ITA No. 457/Asr/2024 with the only exception that the delay in filing

PRANAY MAHAJAN WELFARE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- WARD 2(1), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 461/ASR/2024[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2023-2024

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: None (Adjournment application)
Section 143(1)Section 250

condone the same, and we are in agreement with the view taken by the ld. first appellate authority. 7. As such, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. I.T.A. No. 458/Asr/2024 for A.Y. 2015-16: 8. In this appeal filed by the assessee, the facts are identical to ITA No. 457/Asr/2024 with the only exception that the delay in filing

PRANAY MAHAJAN WELFARE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 459/ASR/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: None (Adjournment application)
Section 143(1)Section 250

condone the same, and we are in agreement with the view taken by the ld. first appellate authority. 7. As such, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. I.T.A. No. 458/Asr/2024 for A.Y. 2015-16: 8. In this appeal filed by the assessee, the facts are identical to ITA No. 457/Asr/2024 with the only exception that the delay in filing

PRANAY MAHAJAN WELFARE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 458/ASR/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: None (Adjournment application)
Section 143(1)Section 250

condone the same, and we are in agreement with the view taken by the ld. first appellate authority. 7. As such, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. I.T.A. No. 458/Asr/2024 for A.Y. 2015-16: 8. In this appeal filed by the assessee, the facts are identical to ITA No. 457/Asr/2024 with the only exception that the delay in filing

M/S. PINKU BATRA ,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the particular issue u/s 153C of the Act related in ITA

ITA 326/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 153A

154; F.A. & AB Ltd. v. Lupton (Inspector of taxes), [1972] A.C. 634; Osborne v. Rowlett. 13 Ch D 774 and Quinn v. Leathem. [1901] AC 495, relied on Griffiths v. J.P. Harrison I.T.A. Nos. 436 & 437/Asr/2018 22 & Others Group of cases (Watford) Ltd., [1963] AC 1; Finsbury Securities Ltd. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, [1966] 1 WLR 1402, referred to.116” Also

MEASAGE GURU NANAK MILK PRODUCTS,FEROZEPUR CANTT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the particular issue u/s 153C of the Act related in ITA

ITA 583/ASR/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 153A

154; F.A. & AB Ltd. v. Lupton (Inspector of taxes), [1972] A.C. 634; Osborne v. Rowlett. 13 Ch D 774 and Quinn v. Leathem. [1901] AC 495, relied on Griffiths v. J.P. Harrison I.T.A. Nos. 436 & 437/Asr/2018 22 & Others Group of cases (Watford) Ltd., [1963] AC 1; Finsbury Securities Ltd. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, [1966] 1 WLR 1402, referred to.116” Also