TRANSWORLD MUSLIM UNIVERSITY DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE,BARBAR SHAH SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-( EXEMPTIONS), JAMMU

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144B of the I.T. Act. 2 I.T.A. Nos. 39 & 40/Asr/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 2. Condonation of delay: It is pointed out by the registry that both the appeals are belated by 277 (two hundred seventy seven) days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay in respect of both the years stating that

SANGAM TRADERS 60-GOLDEN AVENUE SAILI ROAD PATHANKOT,PATHANKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 PATHANKOT SAILI ROAD PATHANKOT, PATHANKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144B of the Act, 1961 dated 20.09.2022. 2 I.T.A. No. 706/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2020-21 2. The assessee has taken 8 (eight) grounds of appeal in Form No. 36 challenging the addition of Rs. 10.76 crores u/s 144 of the Act and sustained and in first appeal, the main grievance of the assessee is that the ld. first appellate authority

THE DALLA CO OP AGRI MULTIPURPOSE SOCIETY LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-, PHAGWARA

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 593/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2018-19 The Dalla Co-Op. Agri Vs. Ito, Ward (1), Multipurpose Society Ltd. C/O Phagwara. B.D. Bansal & Co. B-641, Ground Floor Near A Block Gurudwara Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar. [Pan:-Aacat2201M] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Lakshay Bansal, Ca Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. Dr Respondent By Date Of Hearing 22.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 23.03.2026

144B, vide order dated 06.05.2021. 2. Condonation of delay: It is pointed out by the registry that this appeal is belatedly filed by 90 (ninety days). The assessee has filed an application for I.T.A. No. 593/Asr/2025 2 Assessment Year: 2018-19 condonation, where the ld. counsel Sh. Tarun Bansal (Advocate) stated that his office staff Mr. Puneet was handling

SHRI GULZAR AHMAD DAR ,ANANTNAG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2016-17]

condone the delay and admit this appeal for hearing. 4. Brief facts of the case: The assessee is an individual, engaged in the business of trading of construction material (iron, cement & other related items) as wholesaler & retailer during the financial year 2015-16. In this case, the AO had information that the assessee had deposited cash

SHRI ADIL KHURSHID BHAT,ANANTNAG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, UDHAMPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144B) dated 04/03/2024, passed u/s 271(1)(b) dated 27/06/2024 and passed u/s 271F dated 27/06/2024, respectively. 2 I.T.A. Nos. 579 to 581/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 ITA 579/Asr/ 2024: 2. The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in form 36 are as follows: “1. The action of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - NFAC in passing

SH ADIL KHURSHID BHAT,ANANTNAG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, UDHAMPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144B) dated 04/03/2024, passed u/s 271(1)(b) dated 27/06/2024 and passed u/s 271F dated 27/06/2024, respectively. 2 I.T.A. Nos. 579 to 581/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 ITA 579/Asr/ 2024: 2. The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in form 36 are as follows: “1. The action of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - NFAC in passing

SHRI ADIL KHURSHID BHAT,ANANTNAG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, UDHAMPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144B) dated 04/03/2024, passed u/s 271(1)(b) dated 27/06/2024 and passed u/s 271F dated 27/06/2024, respectively. 2 I.T.A. Nos. 579 to 581/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 ITA 579/Asr/ 2024: 2. The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in form 36 are as follows: “1. The action of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - NFAC in passing

SONU, FAZILKA,PUNJAB vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, JOA ITO WARD 2(3), ABOHAR, PUNJAB

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144B of the Act, dated 25.03.2023. 2 I.T.A. No. 220/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2018-19 2. There are five grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in Form No. 36 and the main grievance of the assessee is that the ld. first appellate authority has dismissed the appeal without adjudicating the same on merits of the case by refusing to condone