Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai53 Delhi40 Kolkata20 Bangalore11 Mumbai9 Pune8 Jaipur7 Lucknow6 Patna6 Hyderabad5 Amritsar5 Cuttack5 Ahmedabad4 Surat2 Chandigarh2 Orissa2 Dehradun1 Indore1 Himachal Pradesh1 Raipur1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 26316 Section 271D8 Section 269S6 Section 1485 Section 1443 Addition to Income3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 144A2 Section 69A

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

The appeals of the assessee are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

ITA 40/ASR/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Puri, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR

Section 263Section 269SSection 271D

delay of 967 days in filing these appeals is hereby condoned and appeals are admitted to be heard on merits. 5. The ld. Pr. CIT has observed that during the course of assessment proceedings in the case of M/s Tirath Ram Badri Nath, Abohar in respect of AY 2008-09, AO has noted that the appellant Sh. Manjit Krishan Malhotra

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

SHRI. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

SH. MANJIT KRISHAN MALHOTRA,ABOHAR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCME TAX , BATHINDA

SHRI ARNESH KUMAR SHAKAR EX. MLA,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, DASUYA

DILAWAR KOCHAY,ANANTNAG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ANANTNAG, ANANTNAG

SHRI AJAZ AHMAD KUCHAI,SRI NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, UDHAMPUR