Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10B(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1114 Section 143(1)12 Section 12A7 Section 1546 Section 1396 Exemption5 Section 2503 Section 12A(1)(b)3 Section 139(9)

DERA SWAMI JAGAT GIRI TRUST ( REGD),PATHANKOT vs. COMMISSIONER ODF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assesse society is allowed in the terms indicated as above

ITA 118/ASR/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Shri P. N . Arora, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Gautam, CIT(D.R.)

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 192

1)(b) of the IT Act, 1961, in which the registration has been refused u/s 12A. 2. That the Ld. CIT(E) has grossly erred in not condoning the delay and the worthy CIT(E) should have condoned the delay in view of CBDT Circular No.10/2019 dated 22/05/2019 and Circular No. 28/2019 dated 2 ITA No.118 /(Asr)/20 27/09/2019

DERA SWAMI JAGAT GIRI TRUST ( REGD),PATHANKOT vs. COMMISSIONER ODF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

VOLUNTARY MEDCARE SOCIETY,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS) WARD , JAMMU

DERA SWAMI JAGAT GIRI TRUST ( REGD),PATHANKOT vs. COMMISSIONER ODF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

VOLUNTARY MEDCARE SOCIETY,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS) WARD , JAMMU

SHREE AMAR KSHATRIYA SABHA CHARITABLE TRUST ,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JAMMU

MEASAGE GRAM SEWA AND VIKLANG SHAYTA SANSTHA REGD,BATHINDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

SNATAN DHARM SABHA,MUKERIAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR