Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1114 Section 143(1)12 Section 12A7 Section 1546 Section 1396 Exemption5 Section 2503 Section 12A(1)(b)3 Section 139(9)

DERA SWAMI JAGAT GIRI TRUST ( REGD),PATHANKOT vs. COMMISSIONER ODF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assesse society is allowed in the terms indicated as above

ITA 118/ASR/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Feb 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Shri P. N . Arora, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Gautam, CIT(D.R.)

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 192

10B has been obtained after not fall in purview of the above circular issued by the CBDT present application OF THE ASESEE FOR CONDATON OF DELAY U/S 192(2)B IS HEREBY REJECTED.” 3. The learned AR for the assessee submitted that the CIT exemption Chandigarh has refused to condone the delay in filing application in form number

DERA SWAMI JAGAT GIRI TRUST ( REGD),PATHANKOT vs. COMMISSIONER ODF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

VOLUNTARY MEDCARE SOCIETY,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS) WARD , JAMMU

DERA SWAMI JAGAT GIRI TRUST ( REGD),PATHANKOT vs. COMMISSIONER ODF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

VOLUNTARY MEDCARE SOCIETY,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS) WARD , JAMMU

SHREE AMAR KSHATRIYA SABHA CHARITABLE TRUST ,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JAMMU

SNATAN DHARM SABHA,MUKERIAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

MEASAGE GRAM SEWA AND VIKLANG SHAYTA SANSTHA REGD,BATHINDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH