SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

trust/ society/ formation document, it isthe substance, i.e, for what purposes, the funds were actually used ( whether funds were used solely and exclusively for the benefit of the particular religious community or not) . 31. Undoubtedly, the Lower Authorities while rejecting the application for registration of the Assessee U/s 80G (5)(iii) of the Act had wrongly swayed with the preamble

BHAI DAYA SINGH JI BHAI HIMMAT SINGH JI NISHKAM SATSANG SABHA THROUGH ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE,LUDHIANA, PUNJAB vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Accordingly. 22. In the combined result, both appeals (ITA No.728 & 732/SRT/2023) are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Sh. Udayan Das Gupta & Sh. Khettra Mohan Roy

iii) of 3rd proviso of section 80(5) of the Act, the Tribunal may condone the delay in filing the Form No.10AB, u/s 80G(5) of the Act. Therefore, we are of the view that delay in filing the Form No.10AB, u/s 80G(5) should be condoned in the interest of justice. For that we rely on the judgment

BHAI DAYA SINGH JI BHAI DHARAM SINGH JI NISHKAM SATSANG SABHA,LUDHIANA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Accordingly. 22. In the combined result, both appeals (ITA No.728 & 732/SRT/2023) are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Sh. Udayan Das Gupta & Sh. Khettra Mohan Roy

iii) of 3rd proviso of section 80(5) of the Act, the Tribunal may condone the delay in filing the Form No.10AB, u/s 80G(5) of the Act. Therefore, we are of the view that delay in filing the Form No.10AB, u/s 80G(5) should be condoned in the interest of justice. For that we rely on the judgment

SANT BABA BODHA NANAD GAUSHALLA COMMITTEE,MANSA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2023-24] Sant Baba Bodha Nand Gaushalla The Cit(Exemptions), Chandigarh, Committee/Aop (Trust) C/O-J. K. Aayakar Bhawan, Sector-17-E, Gupta, Advocate 4702, Hospital Vs Chandigarh-160017 Bazar, Bathinda, (Punjab)-151005 Pan-Aaits0667H Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri J. K. Gupta, Adv Respondent By Sh. M.S. Nethrapal, Cit-Dr

iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act has not been filed within the time limit prescribed therein and also the assessee has not filed its application within the extended time limit provided by CBDT vide its circular No. 12 of 2021 dated 25.06.2021, circular No.16 of 2021 dated 29.08.2021 and circular

M/S SANTOSH FOUNDATION ,RAMPURA PHUL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

iii) that the composition of the applicant company is restrictive and to that extent not amenable to public charity, (iv) that additionally, it is reiterated to be a mere instrument to carry out the CSR functions of the holding company self confessedly and given its restrictive composition it surely doesn’t enure to the benefit of general public nor does

SARFROSH FOUNDATION,MOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result, the both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

iii) of section (ac) of sub-section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for seeking registration u/s 12AB of the Act for the trust claimed to be created on 26.02.2020 by M/s Puri Oil Mills Ltd., a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at 302 Jyoti Sikhar Building, 8 Distt. Centre, Janak Puri

SARFROSH FOUNDATION,MOGA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

iii) of section (ac) of sub-section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for seeking registration u/s 12AB of the Act for the trust claimed to be created on 26.02.2020 by M/s Puri Oil Mills Ltd., a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at 302 Jyoti Sikhar Building, 8 Distt. Centre, Janak Puri

M/S STEP BY STEP JUNIOR SCHOOL SOCIETY,AMRITSAR. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Charitable Trust and Ors vs Union of India and Ors reported in 327 ITR 73. ITA 596/Amr/2016 9 10. Decision of Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT(E) Chandigarh vs. Shree Mahavir Jain Society (Regd.) in Appeal No. 231 of 2016 order dated 11/09/2017. 17. On the contrary, the learned D.R. for the revenue had submitted that

SPIRTUAL WELFARE SOCIETY ,GURDAS PUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessees bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Charitable Society, Catholic Chandigarh. Church Jalalena road Kotkapura, Faridkot, Punjab. [PAN:AADTD7394P] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh.S.R. Kaushik CIT. DR Date of Hearing 27.02.2023 Date of Pronouncement 15.03.2023 ORDER Per: Bench: These appeals by above two assessees are directed against different orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh,[in brevity

SPIRITUAL WELFARE SOCIETY,GURDAS PUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessees bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Charitable Society, Catholic Chandigarh. Church Jalalena road Kotkapura, Faridkot, Punjab. [PAN:AADTD7394P] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh.S.R. Kaushik CIT. DR Date of Hearing 27.02.2023 Date of Pronouncement 15.03.2023 ORDER Per: Bench: These appeals by above two assessees are directed against different orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh,[in brevity

DEEN DAYAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessees bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Charitable Society, Catholic Chandigarh. Church Jalalena road Kotkapura, Faridkot, Punjab. [PAN:AADTD7394P] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh.S.R. Kaushik CIT. DR Date of Hearing 27.02.2023 Date of Pronouncement 15.03.2023 ORDER Per: Bench: These appeals by above two assessees are directed against different orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh,[in brevity

DEEN DAYAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of the assessees bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Charitable Society, Catholic Chandigarh. Church Jalalena road Kotkapura, Faridkot, Punjab. [PAN:AADTD7394P] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh.S.R. Kaushik CIT. DR Date of Hearing 27.02.2023 Date of Pronouncement 15.03.2023 ORDER Per: Bench: These appeals by above two assessees are directed against different orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh,[in brevity

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Trust 96 taxmann.com 356 (Kerala) as decided by the Kerala High Court is held as under: “4. Since the assessee is engaged in the activity of imparting education since its establishment, it moved two applications, one on 08-10-1998 seeking recognition under section 80G of the Act and other on 25-05-1999 seeking registration under section 12A with

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Trust 96 taxmann.com 356 (Kerala) as decided by the Kerala High Court is held as under: “4. Since the assessee is engaged in the activity of imparting education since its establishment, it moved two applications, one on 08-10-1998 seeking recognition under section 80G of the Act and other on 25-05-1999 seeking registration under section 12A with

M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Trust 96 taxmann.com 356 (Kerala) as decided by the Kerala High Court is held as under: “4. Since the assessee is engaged in the activity of imparting education since its establishment, it moved two applications, one on 08-10-1998 seeking recognition under section 80G of the Act and other on 25-05-1999 seeking registration under section 12A with

SIKH MISSIONARYCOLLEGE,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, EXMEPTION WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year:2023-24]

iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act was not maintainable as the trust/institution was established with aims and objects of religious nature, which cannot be considered to be for charitable purposes per the provisions of section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act. Accordingly, she held that the application filed by the applicant for approval

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR/, MUKTSAR,PUNJAB

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

5 purpose or for violation of any other object clause of the society, this application should have been accepted and registration should have been granted. 5.4 He further submitted, drawing reference to the financial statements of the assessee, that the said expenses has been incurred wholly to meet the objects of the society and there is no violation on financial

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR, MUKTSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

5 purpose or for violation of any other object clause of the society, this application should have been accepted and registration should have been granted. 5.4 He further submitted, drawing reference to the financial statements of the assessee, that the said expenses has been incurred wholly to meet the objects of the society and there is no violation on financial

Y S MAKHDOOMI MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,SRINAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeals of assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

80G (5) of the Act. But the assessee was granted provisional registration u/s 12AA of the Act on dated 27.05.2021. The assessee made application for grant of final registration after receiving the provisional registration. But the final registration was duly rejected by the ld. CIT(E) and passed the order accordingly. Being aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before us. 5