SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

2) & Polytechnic College (1), Hospitals, Lungars, Sarais, Educational Aid, Aid to Poor, Medical Aid, Aid for Historical Buildings, Cancer Aid, Aid for Natural Calamities like Earthquakes/Droughts, Aid for Social Awareness like drugs, dowry etc. b. Further, it is a publicly known fact that the aforesaid charitable activities are provided to the public at large without discrimination of religion, caste, creed

M/S SANTOSH FOUNDATION ,RAMPURA PHUL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

iv) that additionally, it is reiterated to be a mere instrument to carry out the CSR functions of the holding company self confessedly and given its restrictive composition it surely doesn’t enure to the benefit of general public nor does it partake the meaning of a public charitable company, and (v) that none of the stated objects of creating

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

2. Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub- section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from the end of the month in which the application was received under clause (a) [or clause (aa) [or clause (ab)] of sub-section (1)] of section 12A.] 18. Based on the above said amendment

M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

2. Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub- section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from the end of the month in which the application was received under clause (a) [or clause (aa) [or clause (ab)] of sub-section (1)] of section 12A.] 18. Based on the above said amendment

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

2. Every order granting or refusing registration under clause (b) of sub- section (1) shall be passed before the expiry of six months from the end of the month in which the application was received under clause (a) [or clause (aa) [or clause (ab)] of sub-section (1)] of section 12A.] 18. Based on the above said amendment

M/S STEP BY STEP JUNIOR SCHOOL SOCIETY,AMRITSAR. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Charitable Trust and Ors vs Union of India and Ors reported in 327 ITR 73. ITA 596/Amr/2016 9 10. Decision of Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT(E) Chandigarh vs. Shree Mahavir Jain Society (Regd.) in Appeal No. 231 of 2016 order dated 11/09/2017. 17. On the contrary, the learned D.R. for the revenue had submitted that

SANT BABA BODHA NANAD GAUSHALLA COMMITTEE,MANSA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2023-24] Sant Baba Bodha Nand Gaushalla The Cit(Exemptions), Chandigarh, Committee/Aop (Trust) C/O-J. K. Aayakar Bhawan, Sector-17-E, Gupta, Advocate 4702, Hospital Vs Chandigarh-160017 Bazar, Bathinda, (Punjab)-151005 Pan-Aaits0667H Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri J. K. Gupta, Adv Respondent By Sh. M.S. Nethrapal, Cit-Dr

iv) of the first proviso to sub-section 5 of section 80G of the Act for the period commencing from 04.04.2022 to AY 2024-25. 4 09.01.2024 The assessee was intimated by the Assessing Officer vide notice dated 09.01.2024 that apparently, they had not filed the present application under Clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section

SIKH MISSIONARYCOLLEGE,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, EXMEPTION WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year:2023-24]

iv)(B) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act was filed by the applicant on 30.03.2024. In order to examine and verify the objects of the trust or the institution and the genuineness of its activities and fulfilment of all the 2ITA No.640/ASR/2024 conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of section 80G

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR/, MUKTSAR,PUNJAB

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

Trust v. Commissioner of Income- tax (Exemptions) (Refer Page no. 15-18 of Case Law PB) iv. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 913 (Mumbai - Trib.) IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH 'G' Zarina Foundation ^Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) (Refer Page no. 19-22 of Case Law PB) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 9 v. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1112 Pune

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR, MUKTSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

Trust v. Commissioner of Income- tax (Exemptions) (Refer Page no. 15-18 of Case Law PB) iv. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 913 (Mumbai - Trib.) IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH 'G' Zarina Foundation ^Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) (Refer Page no. 19-22 of Case Law PB) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 9 v. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1112 Pune

GARDEX HUMAN FOUNDATION ,KARTAR PUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing)

2. The brief facts emerging from records are that the assessee is a charitable trust and has applied for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act on 27.09.2024 alongwith copies of trust deed, provisional registration, copies of audited financial statements, copy of bank statements and photographic evidence of charitable activities carried out . However, the said application for registration

GARDEX HUMAN FOUNDATION,KARTAR PUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Hybrid Hearing)

2. The brief facts emerging from records are that the assessee is a charitable trust and has applied for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act on 27.09.2024 alongwith copies of trust deed, provisional registration, copies of audited financial statements, copy of bank statements and photographic evidence of charitable activities carried out . However, the said application for registration

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

Charitable Trust v. CIT (in WP(C) 12347 of 2005 dated 9/5/2006), where the same contention, i.e., of the non- passing of orders (in that case u/s. 12AA as well as s. 80G(5) of the Act) within the stipulated time period of six months as amounting to a deemed acceptance of the relevant application/s, was negatived

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

Charitable Trust v. CIT (in WP(C) 12347 of 2005 dated 9/5/2006), where the same contention, i.e., of the non- passing of orders (in that case u/s. 12AA as well as s. 80G(5) of the Act) within the stipulated time period of six months as amounting to a deemed acceptance of the relevant application/s, was negatived

M/S MADAD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,AMRITSAR vs. COMM OF INCOME TAX ( EXAMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 225/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year:

80G(5)(vi) with respect to “the activities, that could be construed as Charitable are mainly on providing Scholarship”, only, and not for all other activities of Charitable & Advancement of any other object of General Public Utility in nature, as specified in Trust Deed without mentioning any reason.’ 2 Madad Charitable Foundation v. CIT 3. Opening the arguments