M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable or religious purposes, while Section 12 deals with income of trusts or institutions from voluntary contributions1. I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 12 To be eligible for registration under Section 12A, a trust or institution must meet certain conditions and requirements. The above-mentioned order of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court is applicable

SH. RAM SHARAN DASS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable or religious purposes, while Section 12 deals with income of trusts or institutions from voluntary contributions1. I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 12 To be eligible for registration under Section 12A, a trust or institution must meet certain conditions and requirements. The above-mentioned order of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court is applicable

SH. RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable or religious purposes, while Section 12 deals with income of trusts or institutions from voluntary contributions1. I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 12 To be eligible for registration under Section 12A, a trust or institution must meet certain conditions and requirements. The above-mentioned order of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court is applicable

RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable or religious purposes, while Section 12 deals with income of trusts or institutions from voluntary contributions1. I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 12 To be eligible for registration under Section 12A, a trust or institution must meet certain conditions and requirements. The above-mentioned order of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court is applicable

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable or religious purposes, while Section 12 deals with income of trusts or institutions from voluntary contributions1. I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 12 To be eligible for registration under Section 12A, a trust or institution must meet certain conditions and requirements. The above-mentioned order of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court is applicable

VEENA KHINDRI,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, SRINAGAR

In the result, Assessee's appeal is allowed

6) of the Income Tax\nAct, is bad in law as since the adoption of lower tax\nrate as per section 115BAC cannot be brought under\nthe ambit of adjustment u/s 143(1) which covers\n'arithmetical error, incorrect claim, disallowance of\nloss, disallowance of expenditure, disallowance of\ndeduction or addition of income appearing in form\n26AS or form

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI BHAVNOOR SINGH BEDI, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Y. 2014-15, 2016-17 to 2017-18. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. ACIT, Central Circle-II, Jalandhar(in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, two appeals are filed by the assesses

SHRI BHAVNOOR SINGH BEDI,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Y. 2014-15, 2016-17 to 2017-18. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. ACIT, Central Circle-II, Jalandhar(in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, two appeals are filed by the assesses

SHRI BHAVNOOR SINGH BEDI,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Y. 2014-15, 2016-17 to 2017-18. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. ACIT, Central Circle-II, Jalandhar(in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, two appeals are filed by the assesses

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI BHAVNOOR SINGH BEDI, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Y. 2014-15, 2016-17 to 2017-18. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. ACIT, Central Circle-II, Jalandhar(in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, two appeals are filed by the assesses

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI JATINDER SINGH BEDI, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Y. 2014-15, 2016-17 to 2017-18. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. ACIT, Central Circle-II, Jalandhar(in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, two appeals are filed by the assesses

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI JATINDER SINGH BEDI , JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Y. 2014-15, 2016-17 to 2017-18. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. ACIT, Central Circle-II, Jalandhar(in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, two appeals are filed by the assesses

SHREE AMAR KSHATRIYA SABHA CHARITABLE TRUST ,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 492/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2020-21

250 of the act 61, dated 08/08/2024, which has emanated from the order of the AO, CPC, Bangalore dated 30/11/2021, passed u/s 143(1) of the Act. 2. The grounds of appeal in Form No. 36 are as under: “1. That the Intimation Order passed u/s 143(1) by CPC, Bengaluru and the order passed by the Addl/JCIT

IDARA AUQAF ASLAMIA TRUST,JAMMU & KASAHMIR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ANANTNAG, JAMMU AND KASHMIR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in brevity the Act], in respect of Assessment Year 2009-10. The said order is originated from the order of the ld. Income Tax Officer, 2 Idara Aquaf Islamia Trust v. ITO Ward, Anantnag, Kashmir [in brevity the A.O.] passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, dated 27.12.2011. 2. The assessee

RAHUL KHINDRI,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 (1), AMRITSAR

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 37/Asr/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2021-22 Rahul Khindri, बनाम A.O., Cpc, 2157, Bazar Sirki Banda, Banglore Katra Dullo, Amritsar Indra Nagar, 143001 स्थधयी लेखध सं./Pan No: Apfpk9150F अपीलधथी/Appellant प्रत्यथी/Respondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) निर्धाररती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Rohit Kapoor, Ca रधजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Mrs. Neelam Sharma, Sr.Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing : 23.12.2024 उदघोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10.03.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, Am: Appeal In This Case Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.07.2023 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- 1. That The Ld. C1T(A) Vide Order U/S 250(6) Dated 31.07.2023 Has Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Ao In Not Providing The Benefit Of Lower Tax As Per Section 115Bac Due To The Fact That Form 10 Ie Was Not Filed Before The Due Date Of Filing Of Return U/S 139(1) I.E. 31.12.2021. 37-Asr-2024 Rahul Khindri, Amritsar 2

250(6) of the income Tax Act, is bad in law as the requirement of filing of form 101E before the due date of filing of return u/s 139(1) is directory in nature and as such the benefit lower tax rate cannot be denied. The Assessee has further submitted that - 10.1 The only objection of ADIT (CPC) is that

COMMUNITY POLICING SUVIDHA CENTRE ( WEST ), NOW KNOWN AS SUB DIVISION SAANJH (COMMUNITY POLICING) SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD , JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] order for A.Y. 2016-17.The impugned orders are emanated from the order of the ld. ITO (Exemption) Ward Jalandhar, (in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, both the appeals of the assessees are identical in nature and have a common

SUB DIVISION SAANJH COMMUNITY POL ICING SOCIETY,KAPURTHALA vs. INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] order for A.Y. 2016-17.The impugned orders are emanated from the order of the ld. ITO (Exemption) Ward Jalandhar, (in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act. 2. At the outset, both the appeals of the assessees are identical in nature and have a common

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 has totally ignored the email id registered on the E-filling portal as aogulmarg@gmail.com and has sent the orders on the email id of the TIN FACILIATATION CENTRE which caused late communication to DDO and late filing of appeal in turn. Considering the reasonable cause, we condone 4 I.T.A. Nos. 107 to 109/Asr/2023 Gulmarg Development Authority