GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY ,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

221 has been issued as on 23.01.2023 wherein you were required to furnish the proof of payment of outstanding demand especially late filing fee in my office AAYAKAR BHAWAN ROOM NO 208 Near GOVT SIK FACTORY RAJBAGH SRINAGAR as on 30.01.2023. The DDO thereafter raised the matter with his counsel that the appeal has been dismissed

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

221 has been issued as on 23.01.2023 wherein you were required to furnish the proof of payment of outstanding demand especially late filing fee in my office AAYAKAR BHAWAN ROOM NO 208 Near GOVT SIK FACTORY RAJBAGH SRINAGAR as on 30.01.2023. The DDO thereafter raised the matter with his counsel that the appeal has been dismissed

SIKH MISSIONARYCOLLEGE,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, EXMEPTION WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year:2023-24]

trust or the institution and the genuineness of its activities and fulfilment of all the 2ITA No.640/ASR/2024 conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of section 80G(5) of the Act, a questionnaire was issued electronically on 12.08.2024 by the ld. CIT(E) requesting the assessee to furnish the documents/details online through e- proceedings on e-filing portal along