M/S BABA BANDA BAHADUR MEMORIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 66/Asr/2017 Assessment Year:2015-16

143(3) of the Act and no defect was pointed out by the department. He further submitted that in tabular form the CIT(E)’s reason of rejection of 4. its application and its contentions in tabular form as under. 1. The request for registration u/s 10(23C)(vi) was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) by giving the following points

RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) is related to the claim of exemption u/s 11 which is read with section 12A of the Act. The exemption is allowable for the registered trust not for the unregistered trust. With due respect, the order of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court is binding on section 12AA for restoration of registration. Section 12A provides for the conditions

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- (EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) is related to the claim of exemption u/s 11 which is read with section 12A of the Act. The exemption is allowable for the registered trust not for the unregistered trust. With due respect, the order of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court is binding on section 12AA for restoration of registration. Section 12A provides for the conditions

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) is related to the claim of exemption u/s 11 which is read with section 12A of the Act. The exemption is allowable for the registered trust not for the unregistered trust. With due respect, the order of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court is binding on section 12AA for restoration of registration. Section 12A provides for the conditions

SH. RAM SHARAN DASS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) is related to the claim of exemption u/s 11 which is read with section 12A of the Act. The exemption is allowable for the registered trust not for the unregistered trust. With due respect, the order of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court is binding on section 12AA for restoration of registration. Section 12A provides for the conditions

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) is related to the claim of exemption u/s 11 which is read with section 12A of the Act. The exemption is allowable for the registered trust not for the unregistered trust. With due respect, the order of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court is binding on section 12AA for restoration of registration. Section 12A provides for the conditions

SH. RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) is related to the claim of exemption u/s 11 which is read with section 12A of the Act. The exemption is allowable for the registered trust not for the unregistered trust. With due respect, the order of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court is binding on section 12AA for restoration of registration. Section 12A provides for the conditions

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- (EXEMPTIONS)), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) is related to the claim of exemption u/s 11 which is read with section 12A of the Act. The exemption is allowable for the registered trust not for the unregistered trust. With due respect, the order of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court is binding on section 12AA for restoration of registration. Section 12A provides for the conditions

SH. VISHWA MITTER SEKHRI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,BATALA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), AMRITSAR.

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 75/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2007-08

143(3) read with section 148 of the Act. 27. In the present case, the Total Receipt was Rs. 2,66,67,690/-for the assessment year 2007- 2008 and Excess of income over expenditure was Rs. 1,03,75,360/-, and the assessee was neither having exemption under 10(23) nor was having registration under section

M/S SANT BABA BHAG SINGH MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE - 1 (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 432/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2014-15

143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated 25.11.2016 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2014-15. 2. The assessee-society, registered u/s. 12AA of the Act, is engaged in charitable activity by way of running various educational and medical institutions, the names of seven of which are listed at pg. 15 of the assessment order. Its’ accounts

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable society, which is running a Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital since 1998 and had rendered an exemplary service, even during the course of COVID 19 by distributing free medicines. The society had been filing the returns year after year and there is an assessment order u/s 143(3) for Asstt. Year 2003-04, which copy has been placed

M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable society, which is running a Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital since 1998 and had rendered an exemplary service, even during the course of COVID 19 by distributing free medicines. The society had been filing the returns year after year and there is an assessment order u/s 143(3) for Asstt. Year 2003-04, which copy has been placed

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable society, which is running a Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital since 1998 and had rendered an exemplary service, even during the course of COVID 19 by distributing free medicines. The society had been filing the returns year after year and there is an assessment order u/s 143(3) for Asstt. Year 2003-04, which copy has been placed

LANGAR COMMITTEE HANUMAN MANDIR,MALERKOTLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXAMPTION),, JALANDHAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is disposed on the aforesaid terms

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N.K.Choudhryi.T.A No. 516/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2014-15

143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 vide order dated 30.11.2016. 2. The issue arising in the instant appeal is the determination of the correct income for the current year chargeable to tax under the Act. While the assessee claims the same to be nil, the Revenue has assessed

SHRI AMAR NATH JAIN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTION ) , JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Charitable Trust, (Exemptions), B-XXIV-4632, Jain Mandir Ward Jalandhar Road, Ludhiana [PAN: AADTS 4396N] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 13.10.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 21.10.2022 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 24.04.2019 passed

SHRI KALU MAL SHORIMAL NATHUMAL RANGWALA PRIVATE FAIMLY DHARAMNATH TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) for A.Y. 1992-93 dated 30.03.1997 where the object of the trust was accepted, and the assessee was allowed to deduction u/s 11 and 12. The copy of the assessment order at APB pages 33 to 34. The ld. AR further placed that all the trust deed other than one and 1/36 renunciate the obligation on the trust

LATE SH BHAGAT CHAJJU RAM,JAMMU vs. ITO EXEMPTION JAMMU, JAMMU

In the result, the captioned four appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing)

143(1)(a) of the act against the asseessee with respect to the assessment year 2017-18. ITA No. 498 to 500/Asr/2024 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2022-23) 7. In these three appeals the assessee trust has challenged the common issue of denial of the benefit of section 11 of the Act. The Ld. Counsel

LATE SH BHAGAT CHAJJU RAM MEMORIAL TRUST,JAMMU vs. ITO EXEMPTION, JAMMU

In the result, the captioned four appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing)

143(1)(a) of the act against the asseessee with respect to the assessment year 2017-18. ITA No. 498 to 500/Asr/2024 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2022-23) 7. In these three appeals the assessee trust has challenged the common issue of denial of the benefit of section 11 of the Act. The Ld. Counsel

LATE SH BHAGAT CHAJJU RAM MEMORIAL TRUST,JAMMU vs. ITO, JAMMU

In the result, the captioned four appeals of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing)

143(1)(a) of the act against the asseessee with respect to the assessment year 2017-18. ITA No. 498 to 500/Asr/2024 (Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2022-23) 7. In these three appeals the assessee trust has challenged the common issue of denial of the benefit of section 11 of the Act. The Ld. Counsel