LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable and there was no change in activities of the assessee. In our view the assessee, though was registered on 25.9.2009, however the assessee, was entitled to the benefit of section 11, 12 and 13 of the income tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 under consideration in terms of the proviso to section 12 A of The Income

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable and there was no change in activities of the assessee. In our view the assessee, though was registered on 25.9.2009, however the assessee, was entitled to the benefit of section 11, 12 and 13 of the income tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 under consideration in terms of the proviso to section 12 A of The Income

M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable and there was no change in activities of the assessee. In our view the assessee, though was registered on 25.9.2009, however the assessee, was entitled to the benefit of section 11, 12 and 13 of the income tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 under consideration in terms of the proviso to section 12 A of The Income

SHREE AMAR KSHATRIYA SABHA CHARITABLE TRUST ,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 492/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2020-21

ii. In the case of Conference of Religious India, in ITA 2161/Del/2022, order dated 13/10/2022, Asst year : 2020-21, I.T.A. No. 492/Asr/2024 7 Assessment Year: 2020-21 iii. In the case of Susila Educational Trust in ITA No.1095/Chny/2024 dated 30/08/2024, 167 Taxmann.com 326 (Chennai-Trib.) Relying on the above decisions the ld. AR submitted that since in the instant case

RAHUL KHINDRI,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 (1), AMRITSAR

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 37/Asr/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2021-22 Rahul Khindri, बनाम A.O., Cpc, 2157, Bazar Sirki Banda, Banglore Katra Dullo, Amritsar Indra Nagar, 143001 स्थधयी लेखध सं./Pan No: Apfpk9150F अपीलधथी/Appellant प्रत्यथी/Respondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) निर्धाररती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Rohit Kapoor, Ca रधजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Mrs. Neelam Sharma, Sr.Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing : 23.12.2024 उदघोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10.03.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, Am: Appeal In This Case Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.07.2023 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- 1. That The Ld. C1T(A) Vide Order U/S 250(6) Dated 31.07.2023 Has Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Ao In Not Providing The Benefit Of Lower Tax As Per Section 115Bac Due To The Fact That Form 10 Ie Was Not Filed Before The Due Date Of Filing Of Return U/S 139(1) I.E. 31.12.2021. 37-Asr-2024 Rahul Khindri, Amritsar 2

143(1) without allowing benefit of tax rate prescribed under new scheme of taxation on ground that Form 10-IF had not been filed within e allowed under section 139(1) - Whether since requirement of filing Form 10-IE was directory in nature and not mandatory and it was sufficient compliance if said form was before Assessing Officer at time

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust, Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Nehru Garden Road ,Jalandhar. Income Tax, Circle-III, [PAN: AAATS3278A] Jalandhar. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh.Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. RadheyShyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 13.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement 20.12.2022 ORDER Per: Bench: In the aforesaid appeals of the assessee for various Assessment Years, the grievance of the assessee is common

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust, Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Nehru Garden Road ,Jalandhar. Income Tax, Circle-III, [PAN: AAATS3278A] Jalandhar. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh.Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. RadheyShyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 13.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement 20.12.2022 ORDER Per: Bench: In the aforesaid appeals of the assessee for various Assessment Years, the grievance of the assessee is common

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust, Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Nehru Garden Road ,Jalandhar. Income Tax, Circle-III, [PAN: AAATS3278A] Jalandhar. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh.Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. RadheyShyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 13.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement 20.12.2022 ORDER Per: Bench: In the aforesaid appeals of the assessee for various Assessment Years, the grievance of the assessee is common

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust, Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Nehru Garden Road ,Jalandhar. Income Tax, Circle-III, [PAN: AAATS3278A] Jalandhar. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh.Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. RadheyShyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 13.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement 20.12.2022 ORDER Per: Bench: In the aforesaid appeals of the assessee for various Assessment Years, the grievance of the assessee is common

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust, Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Nehru Garden Road ,Jalandhar. Income Tax, Circle-III, [PAN: AAATS3278A] Jalandhar. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh.Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. RadheyShyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 13.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement 20.12.2022 ORDER Per: Bench: In the aforesaid appeals of the assessee for various Assessment Years, the grievance of the assessee is common

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust, Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Nehru Garden Road ,Jalandhar. Income Tax, Circle-III, [PAN: AAATS3278A] Jalandhar. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh.Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. RadheyShyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 13.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement 20.12.2022 ORDER Per: Bench: In the aforesaid appeals of the assessee for various Assessment Years, the grievance of the assessee is common

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust, Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Nehru Garden Road ,Jalandhar. Income Tax, Circle-III, [PAN: AAATS3278A] Jalandhar. (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh.Gunjeet Singh Syal, Adv. Respondent by Sh. RadheyShyam Jaiswal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 13.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement 20.12.2022 ORDER Per: Bench: In the aforesaid appeals of the assessee for various Assessment Years, the grievance of the assessee is common

MESERS IMPROVEMENT TRUST ,FAZILKA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

ii) the receipt from such business or commercial activity or service in relation thereto, does not exceed the quantified limit, as amended over the years (Rs. 10 lakhs w.e.f. 1-4-2009; then Rs. 25 lakhs w.e.f. 1-4-2012; and now 20% of total receipts of the previous year, w.e.f. 1-4-2016); I.T.A. No. 307/Asr/2018 10 Assessment Year

INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR vs. M/S RADHA RAMAN CHARITABLE TRUST, GURDASPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(1)of the Act date of order 27.03.2019. The revenue took the following grounds which read as under: “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case which are driven by the clear legal distinction between "income" of a charitable trust as defined u/s 2(24) r.w.s 2(15) r.w.s 11 and "total income" as defined

M/S. LEH NUTRITION PROJECT,,LEH LADKH vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3), as well as, addition of Rs. 1,13,26,754 under the head income from other sources, without rejecting the books of accounts of the assessee and also treated the appellant as Public Limited Company. 2. That the Id AO wrongly made the addition of Rs. 1,13,26,754 on the basis of Audited Receipts & Payments Account

IDARA AUQAF ASLAMIA TRUST,JAMMU & KASAHMIR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ANANTNAG, JAMMU AND KASHMIR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

143(3) of the Act, dated 27.12.2011. 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal: “1. That the assessment order as well as the order of Learned CIT(A), Jammu, both are against the facts of the case and are untenable under the law. 2. That no reasonable opportunity of being heard was allowed by the A.O. before

M/S JOSHPH'S SCHOOL,LUDHIANA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXCEPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 463/Asr/2016 Assessment Year:2016-17 M/S Joseph’S School Dugri Vs. Cit(E), Dhandra Road, Ludhiana. Chandigarh. [Pan: Aaatj3850H] (Appellant) (Respendent)

1. Difference in name on PAN, Income Tax At the outset it is submitted that the reason as given by Returns and on Aims and the Worthy CIT is not sufficient to reject the application u/sec Obiectives, Society certificate. 12AA of the Act. 2. The CIT has held that the name on PAN card The defect is merely a clerical

SCHOOL MANAGING SOCIETY CAPT. GURCHARAN SINGH,KAPURTHALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. Nos. 562 & 563/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2023-24 & 2024-25 School Managing Society Capt. Vs. Dcit, Cpc, Bengaluru/ Gurcharan Singh Kapurthala, Ito (E) Ward, Jalandhar. Punjab. [Pan:-Aadts4577P] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Y.K. Sud, Ca Respondent By Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. Dr

143(1), as per the facts and figures returned by the assessee, and since the exemption u/s 10(23)(c) has never been claimed by the assessee, the said exemption could not have been allowed. 6. In course of hearing the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the powers of the CIT(A) are co terminus with the powers