M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

THE DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13] 10 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 4. Revisionary proceedings were initiated under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 1978-79 proposing to deny exemption claimed by the assessee, which was subsequently dropped after detailed examination of the charitable

MESERS SHRI SWAMI SHANKARNATH PARVAT CHARITABLE AND WELFARE TRUST ,KAPURTHALA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee appeal is allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 602/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: N.A.

10(23)(C) or Sections 11 and 12 are not applicable while considering the application for registration under Section 12AA of the Act. The application for registration is required to be made within one year of the creation of the Trust. Section 12AA of the Act, requires satisfaction in respect of the genuineness of the activities of the Trust, which

M/S BABA BANDA BAHADUR MEMORIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 66/Asr/2017 Assessment Year:2015-16

13. “CIT-1, Chandigarh vs. Sri Guru Gorakh Nath Charitable Educational Society”, considering judgment of the Division Bench in the case of “Pinegrove International Charitable Trust (supra)”, had answered the question that Whether power of Commissioner to look into objects of society and genuineness of same could not be doubted when basis was of non-supply of information

M/S SANTOSH FOUNDATION ,RAMPURA PHUL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

10 of the impugned are completely vague since it has been held in the judgment of Nanak Chand Jain Charitable Trust(Supra) that: “At the time of granting the registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the CIT (exemption) need not go beyond two parameters that the object being charitable in nature and activities being genuine

MESERS IMPROVEMENT TRUST ,FAZILKA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13(8), seventeenth proviso to section 10(23C) and third proviso to section 143(3) (all w.r.e.f. 1-4-2009), reaffirm this interpretation and bring uniformity across the statutory provisions. B. Authorities, corporations, or bodies established by statute B.1. The amounts or any money whatsoever charged by a statutory corporation, board or any other body set up by the state

M/S SANT SHRI MAHESH MUNI JI BOREWALE EDUCATIONAL WELFARE ,MOGA vs. COMM. OF INCOME TAX ( EXAMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaassessment Year - 2016-17

13 management of the DPS schools themselves. This, reaffirms the Assessee's argument that the usage of the gains arising out of its agreements are incidental to its educational purpose outlined by its objective of the Assessee. 30. The interpretation of section 10(23C)(vi) is one that requires fulfillment of a two pronged test: firstly, that any business activity

M/S STEP BY STEP JUNIOR SCHOOL SOCIETY,AMRITSAR. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

13 comes into play at the time of granting exemption under Section 11 of the Act and not at the time of granting registration under Section 12A of the Act. The only two requirements as stated hereinabove while granting registration under Section 12A of the Act, are with respect to the charitable nature of the objects of the assessee

SH. VISHWA MITTER SEKHRI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,BATALA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), AMRITSAR.

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 75/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2007-08

13 of the income tax Act in the light of the insertion of the proviso to section 12 A of the income tax Act more particularly when the assessee was granted the registration on 25 September 2009, and prior thereto the assessee was a having the approval under section 10(23) of the Act. 3 Whether the case is required

M/S MANAGING COMMITTEE SWAMI PREMANAND MAHAVIDALYA,HOSHIARPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION),, CHANDIGARH

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Trust’, [2015] 59 taxmann.com 33 (Karnataka). Head note of the decision is reproduced below: Section 10(23C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Educational institutions (Institutions substantially financed by Government) - Assessment years 2003-04 and 2005-06 - Assessee was running a number of educational institutions - Assessing Officer declined to grant relief claimed by assessee under section 10(23C)(iiiab) - Material

M/S ANWAR SULTANA EDUCTIONAL TRUST,SRINAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 140/Asr/2020 Assessment Year:N/A M/S Anwar Sultana Educational Vs. Cit(E), Trust, 29 Housing Colony Sanat Chandigarh. Nagar, Srinagar. [Pan: Aafta2878M] (Appellant) (Respendent)

Charitable Trust is a trust solely created for imparting education as per the relevant clause of the Deed for creation of the Trust. The appellant had applied for Registration U/S 12AA of the Income Tax Act 1961 before Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemptions Chandigarh which has been denied. Then the appellant 4 I.T.A. No. 140/Asr/2020 appealed to the Honorable