M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

THE DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 13(3)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Act. The relevant para of the judgment are reproduced hereunder: “14. On the basis of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, broadly, the following issues arise for consideration in these appeals:- (a) Whether the object of the assessee trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable

MESERS SHRI SWAMI SHANKARNATH PARVAT CHARITABLE AND WELFARE TRUST ,KAPURTHALA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee appeal is allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 602/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: N.A.

Charitable or religious trust - Registration procedure - Assessment year 201011 - Whether while examining application seeking registration under section 12AA, manner of application of funds of trust do not fall within purview of Commissioner; Commissioner should only satisfy himself about genuineness of aims and objects of trust/institution and genuineness of its activities as enumerated in clause (b) of sub-section

M/S SANTOSH FOUNDATION ,RAMPURA PHUL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust/ institution for exemption u/s 11 r.w.s 13 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 whichfalls in the domain of the AO. Once the CIT has not doubted about the genuineness of the activities of the assesseenor doubted its charitable object, his powers under section

M/S BABA BANDA BAHADUR MEMORIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 66/Asr/2017 Assessment Year:2015-16

13. “CIT-1, Chandigarh vs. Sri Guru Gorakh Nath Charitable Educational Society”, considering judgment of the Division Bench in the case of “Pinegrove International Charitable Trust (supra)”, had answered the question that Whether power of Commissioner to look into objects of society and genuineness of same could not be doubted when basis was of non-supply of information

MAHARAJA RANJIT SINGH WAR MUSEUM SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXAMPTION), JALANDHAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 618/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2014-15

13, along with sections 10 to 10C (and sections 13A and 13B, which relate to political parties) comprise Chapter III of the Act titled ‘Incomes which do not form part of the total income’. Section 11 provides for exemption in respect of income from property held under trust by a charitable

M/S ANWAR SULTANA EDUCTIONAL TRUST,SRINAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 140/Asr/2020 Assessment Year:N/A M/S Anwar Sultana Educational Vs. Cit(E), Trust, 29 Housing Colony Sanat Chandigarh. Nagar, Srinagar. [Pan: Aafta2878M] (Appellant) (Respendent)

section read with rule 17A, and whether Form 10A has been properly filled up. He may also see whether the objects of the trust are charitable or not. At that stage, it is not proper to examine the application of income. 12 I.T.A. No. 140/Asr/2020 In case of “UP Forest Corporation Vs CIT”, the Honorable supreme Court 13

M/S SANT BABA BHAG SINGH MEMORIAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE - 1 (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 432/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2014-15

charitable trust or institution, and section 68. Where a receipt is admitted as income, where, pray, and even as afore-stated, is the need to travel to section 68 which, as afore-noted, requires proving the nature and source of the receipt lest it may be assessed as income. Section 115BBC r/w s. 13

BAHUDER KE TEXTILES AND KNITWEARS ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION ) , CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13(8) and, accordingly, he denied exemption as provided under sections 11 and 12 - Whether since dominant object was not only preservation of environment but one of general public utility, object of assessee was charitable in nature, and, thus, assessee was entitled to seek exemption under section 11 - Held, yes [Para 7] [In favour of assessee]” 27. We have noted

BAHADUR KE TEXTILES & KNITWEAR ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

13(8) and, accordingly, he denied exemption as provided under sections 11 and 12 - Whether since dominant object was not only preservation of environment but one of general public utility, object of assessee was charitable in nature, and, thus, assessee was entitled to seek exemption under section 11 - Held, yes [Para 7] [In favour of assessee]” 27. We have noted

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable and there was no change in activities of the assessee. In our view the assessee, though was registered on 25.9.2009, however the assessee, was entitled to the benefit of section 11, 12 and 13 of the income tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 under consideration in terms of the proviso to section 12 A of The Income