BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 127(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka509Delhi250Mumbai103Bangalore70Hyderabad49Chennai40Ahmedabad37Jaipur32Pune26Chandigarh25Kolkata24Calcutta16Visakhapatnam13Lucknow11Agra11Indore8Dehradun6Telangana6Surat5Rajkot5Amritsar4Varanasi4Raipur3Jodhpur2Patna2Rajasthan2SC2Ranchi1Andhra Pradesh1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 80G4Section 1323Exemption3Natural Justice2

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 530/ASR/2009[]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10Section 12ASection 2Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

trust v/s Union of India (2008) 307 ITR 226 (RAJ.) f. Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Social Service Centre (2001) 250 ITR 39 (AP) g. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam vs CCIT (2001) 251 ITR 849 (AP)“ 6. Registration u/s 12AA: An issue raised by the Revenue during the course of argument. a. In this regard, it is pertinent to mention that

C-DOT FORUM ,LUDHIANA vs. THE CIT EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed being devoid of merits

ITA 115/ASR/2025[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Jan 2026AY 2022-2023

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 115 & 116/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2022-23 C-Dot Forum, 644 Phase-1, Vs. Cit (Exemptions) Model Town Bathinda. Chandigarh. [Pan: Aaeac3681J] (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 12A

section 2(15) of the Act 61, for which registration is being sought by the society and secondly whether the assessee in the instant case has violated the (Professional Conduct , Etiquette and ethics) Regulations 2002 prescribed by The Medical council of India ( MCI ) regulations (2002), which prohibits doctors from accepting freebies which such as expenses for travel , hospitality, participation

AL- ANSAR CHARITABLE TRUST ,SRI NAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 149/ASR/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Brajesh Kumar Singh

For Appellant: Sh. Ishtiyaq Ahmad, C.A
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable activities carried out by the trust and he supports the order of the ld. CIT(E). 8. We have heard the rival submissions and considered the materials on record and we find that the application for registration filed u/s 12A, by the assessee, indeed suffers from material and factual deficiencies in absence of all documentary evidences being submitted. However

MESERS KRISHNA DEVI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE SOCIETY,HOSHIARPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

ITA 391/ASR/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 391/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: N/A Smt. Krishna Devi Educational Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society Vill & P.O. Chandigarh. Langari, Chandigarh Road, Mahilpur, Distt. Hoshiarpur. [Pan: Abifs7407A] (Appellant) (Respendent)

Section 127Section 12ASection 132

trust is directed against the order dated 28.03.2018 passed by the CIT(E), Chandigarh whereby he has rejected the application of the assessee seeking registration u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of Income Tax Act. 2 I.T.A. No. 391/Asr/2018 2. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee that the CIT(Exemptions), Chandigarh has erred in law and on facts