DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

THE DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable trust or not, which has nothing to do with the fluctuations in the income year- after- year, will operate as res judicata and the same question cannot be re-agitatedsubsequently. 12 ITA Nos. 184 to 186/Asr/2001 &Ors. Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v.Asstt. CIT& Ors. 12. In the following decisions, too, the Courts have held that though the doctrine

M/S SANTOSH FOUNDATION ,RAMPURA PHUL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

d) CIT vs. Surya Educational 8t Charitable Trust [2011] 15 taxmann.com 123 (Punjab and Haryana) (placed at Page No.59-62 of Judgment Set) e) CIT vs. Baba Kartar Singh Dukki Educational Trust [2014] 42 taxmann.com 17 (Punjab & Haryana) (placed at PageNo. 63-64 of Judgment Set) f) CIT vs. B.K.K Memorial Trust [2013] 29 taxmann.com 286 (Punjab and Haryana) (placed

NAVJEEVAN CHARITABLE SOCIETY FOR INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT ,JALANDHAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( CENTRAL), LUDHINANA

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

11(1)(d) and second was whether Cash withdrawn from bank has been utilized for charitable purpose. However, there was no observation/findings made by the Ld. PCIT in respect of the 3rd issue raised regardingthe source of corpus donation received in cash, in order to hold the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue

BAHADUR KE TEXTILES & KNITWEAR ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

d) CIT vs. B.K.K Memorial Trust [2013] 29 taxmann.com 286 (Punjab and Haryana) e) Saint Kabir Educational Trust vs CIT 41 DTR 27 Asr. Trib. ITA Nos. 501 & 86/Asr/2019&2020 14 Bahadur Ke Textiles & Knitwear Association v. CIT f) CIT vs. IILM Foundation Academy as reported in 389 ITR 148 order dated 16.09.2016 “There was nothing on record which showed

BAHUDER KE TEXTILES AND KNITWEARS ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION ) , CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

d) CIT vs. B.K.K Memorial Trust [2013] 29 taxmann.com 286 (Punjab and Haryana) e) Saint Kabir Educational Trust vs CIT 41 DTR 27 Asr. Trib. ITA Nos. 501 & 86/Asr/2019&2020 14 Bahadur Ke Textiles & Knitwear Association v. CIT f) CIT vs. IILM Foundation Academy as reported in 389 ITR 148 order dated 16.09.2016 “There was nothing on record which showed

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR/, MUKTSAR,PUNJAB

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

d) the trust or institution established for charitable purpose created or established after the commencement of this Act, has applied any part of its income for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste; or I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 6 (e) any activity being carried out by the trust or institution, - (i) is not genuine

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR, MUKTSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

d) the trust or institution established for charitable purpose created or established after the commencement of this Act, has applied any part of its income for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste; or I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 6 (e) any activity being carried out by the trust or institution, - (i) is not genuine

BHAG KAUR AND HARNAM SINGH ZORIA,DASUYA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Trust has diverted these receipts in the name of corpus to the Balance Sheet which, rather, should have been taken as income in the Income & Expenditure account for the F.Y. 2018-19. As per the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, corpus donation/grants would be exempt only under Section 11(1)(d) and an assessee can claim benefit

MESERS IMPROVEMENT TRUST ,FAZILKA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

1-4-2011 does not preclude a statutory corporation, board, or whatever such body may be called, from claiming that it is set up for a charitable purpose and seeking exemption under section 10(23C) or other provisions of the Act. C. Statutory regulators C.1. The income and receipts of statutory regulatory bodies which are for instance, tasked with exclusive

M/S. LEH NUTRITION PROJECT,,LEH LADKH vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable work in Leh region in India and duly granted registration u/s 12AA(1) of the Act, dated. 18-03-11 (APB, Pg.-498). The Ld. AR argued that that the appellant trust having been granted registration u/s 12A vide order dated 21/07/11, therefore, the benefit of such exemption should be granted for the year under consideration also, in view