BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 102clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka452Delhi151Mumbai95Bangalore53Chennai44Jaipur24Pune21Ahmedabad17Visakhapatnam16Calcutta16Chandigarh15Kolkata14Lucknow11Indore8Surat7Hyderabad5Agra4Telangana4Nagpur3Cochin3Amritsar3Rajkot2Panaji2Rajasthan2Jodhpur1Cuttack1Ranchi1SC1Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 12A3Section 133A2Double Taxation/DTAA2Addition to Income2Survey u/s 133A2Undisclosed Income2

M/S SANT SHRI MAHESH MUNI JI BOREWALE EDUCATIONAL WELFARE ,MOGA vs. COMM. OF INCOME TAX ( EXAMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 227/ASR/2017[0]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenaassessment Year - 2016-17

Section 11Section 12Section 12A

Charitable Trust (1976) 102 ITR 474." 31. The authorities in the form of case law referred to above also reiterate that a mere incurrence of (surplus) profit does not automatically presuppose a business activity that invalidates the exemption under section

ASSIATANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PHAGWARA CIRCLE, PHAGWARA vs. SHRI HARMESH KUMAR, PHILLAUR

In the result, these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 42/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
10 Nov 2023
AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Sh. Dr. Vedanshu Tripathi, CIT DR
Section 133A

102 TTJ (Asr) 316, wherein it is held that“………..The AO has mainly relied on the statement recorded by the AO under s. 132(4). It is settled position in law that admission made by the assessee under s. 132(4) is an important piece of evidence, but the same is not conclusive. It is open to the assessee

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PHAGWARA CIRCLE, PHAGWARA vs. SHRI CHUNI LAL, PHILLAUR

In the result, these appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 40/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Sh. Dr. Vedanshu Tripathi, CIT DR
Section 133A

102 TTJ (Asr) 316, wherein it is held that“………..The AO has mainly relied on the statement recorded by the AO under s. 132(4). It is settled position in law that admission made by the assessee under s. 132(4) is an important piece of evidence, but the same is not conclusive. It is open to the assessee