MESERS BORDER PEOPLE EDUCATION SOCIETY ,FEROZPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. N.K.Choudhry & Dr. A.L.Sainiassessment Year: Nil Border People Educational Cit(Exemptions) Society, Chandigarh. Ferozepur City, Vs. [Pan:Aaabb 0422F] (Appellant) (Respondent)

vi) in such cases. Hence the ground of rejection under consideration is liable to be set aside. 2nd 4 Coming to the ground of rejection, the Ld. Commissioner has held that in regards to the claim of surplus of 8 ITA N0.469/Asr/ 2018 Border People Educational Society vs. CIT(E) Rs. 42.53 Lakhs (Claimed as exempt by the applicant

M/S BABA BANDA BAHADUR MEMORIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 66/Asr/2017 Assessment Year:2015-16

vi) was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) by giving the following points which are met as under: Order of Worthy CIT(Ex.) Our Submissions (i) The (i) The Worthy CIT Worthy CIT(Ex.), while (Ex.) has stated drawing this conclusion has that on Page totally overlooked the facts No. 3 in Para 7 of the case of the Assessee

SH. VISHWA MITTER SEKHRI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,BATALA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), AMRITSAR.

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 75/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2007-08

section 10(23) of the Act. 3 Whether the case is required to be remanded back to the file of the assessing officer if the answer to the question number 2 is given in affirmative. Brief facts 1. That the appellant society had filed its return of income for the assessment year 2007-08 on 31.10.2007 at NIL income claiming

THE OXFORD EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 583/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: N/A M/S The Oxford Educational & Vs. Cit(E), Charitable Society (Oxbridge Chandigarh. World School, Kotkapura) Hira Singh Nagar, Kotkapura, Faridkot (Punjab) [Pan: Aabtt6670Q] (Appellant) (Respendent)

charitable, are not sufficient for granting registration to the society under Section 12AA of the Act until and unless the authority, who grants the registration, satisfies himself that the activities of the trust or institution are genuine or not. To satisfy himself he can make such inquiry as he deem necessary. There is no bar under any provision

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Trust 96 taxmann.com 356 (Kerala) as decided by the Kerala High Court is held as under: “4. Since the assessee is engaged in the activity of imparting education since its establishment, it moved two applications, one on 08-10-1998 seeking recognition under section 80G of the Act and other on 25-05-1999 seeking registration under section 12A with

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Trust 96 taxmann.com 356 (Kerala) as decided by the Kerala High Court is held as under: “4. Since the assessee is engaged in the activity of imparting education since its establishment, it moved two applications, one on 08-10-1998 seeking recognition under section 80G of the Act and other on 25-05-1999 seeking registration under section 12A with

M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Trust 96 taxmann.com 356 (Kerala) as decided by the Kerala High Court is held as under: “4. Since the assessee is engaged in the activity of imparting education since its establishment, it moved two applications, one on 08-10-1998 seeking recognition under section 80G of the Act and other on 25-05-1999 seeking registration under section 12A with

LANGAR COMMITTEE HANUMAN MANDIR,MALERKOTLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXAMPTION),, JALANDHAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is disposed on the aforesaid terms

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N.K.Choudhryi.T.A No. 516/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2014-15

23), or by a fund or trust or institution referred to in sub-clause (iv) or sub clause (v) or by an university or other educational institution referred to in sub-clause (iiiad) or sub clause (vi) or by any hospital or other institution referred to in sub-clause (iiiae) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of Section 10

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR, MUKTSAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

Trust v. Commissioner of Income- tax (Exemptions) (Refer Page no. 15-18 of Case Law PB) iv. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 913 (Mumbai - Trib.) IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH 'G' Zarina Foundation ^Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) (Refer Page no. 19-22 of Case Law PB) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 9 v. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1112 Pune

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR/, MUKTSAR,PUNJAB

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

Trust v. Commissioner of Income- tax (Exemptions) (Refer Page no. 15-18 of Case Law PB) iv. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 913 (Mumbai - Trib.) IN THE ITAT MUMBAI BENCH 'G' Zarina Foundation ^Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) (Refer Page no. 19-22 of Case Law PB) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 9 v. [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1112 Pune

IIT ROPAR TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS INCUBATOR FOUNDATION,ROPAR vs. THE CIT EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: N/A]

10 or section 11 or section 12 for any previous year ending on or before the date of such application, at any time after the commencement of such activities:] Provided further that the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, on receipt of an application made under the first proviso, shall,— (i) where the application is made under clause (i) of the said

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

vi) of the I.T. Act,1961.” 13 Copy of Order in the case of Chief Khalsa Diwan dated 24.04.2009 placed on record along filed Written Submissions in the Hon’ble Court on 29.07.2010. 5. Case Laws: In this regard reliance is placed on the following decisions: a. CIT vs. M/s DawoodiBoharaJamat 364 ITR 31 (SC) b. CIT v. Christian Medical

RAHUL KHINDRI,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 (1), AMRITSAR

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 37/Asr/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2021-22 Rahul Khindri, बनाम A.O., Cpc, 2157, Bazar Sirki Banda, Banglore Katra Dullo, Amritsar Indra Nagar, 143001 स्थधयी लेखध सं./Pan No: Apfpk9150F अपीलधथी/Appellant प्रत्यथी/Respondent ( Hybrid Hearing ) निर्धाररती की ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Rohit Kapoor, Ca रधजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Mrs. Neelam Sharma, Sr.Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing : 23.12.2024 उदघोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10.03.2025 आदेश/Order Per Krinwant Sahay, Am: Appeal In This Case Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.07.2023 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- 1. That The Ld. C1T(A) Vide Order U/S 250(6) Dated 31.07.2023 Has Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Ao In Not Providing The Benefit Of Lower Tax As Per Section 115Bac Due To The Fact That Form 10 Ie Was Not Filed Before The Due Date Of Filing Of Return U/S 139(1) I.E. 31.12.2021. 37-Asr-2024 Rahul Khindri, Amritsar 2

VI-A under old scheme - Subsequently, assessee filed revised return, wherein assessee opted for new scheme of taxation under section 115BAC and also submitted Form 10-IE on date of filing revised return - Assessing Officer completed assessment under section 143(1) without allowing benefit of tax rate prescribed under new scheme of taxation on ground that Form 10

M/S. LEH NUTRITION PROJECT,,LEH LADKH vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable activities. However, the surplus from such activities is taxable in the hands of the 4 Leh Nutrition Project v. DCIT appellant as the appellant has not been registered u/s 12A of the Act as required by the provisions of the Income Tax Act and as such the income of the appellant is taxable. 6. The Ld. AR has filed