DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

M/S SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

THE DCIT, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR vs. M/S. SADHU SINGH HAMDARD TRUST, JALANDHAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

trust is encompassed under the expression 'charitable purpose' falling within the ambit of Section 2(15) of the Act? (b) Whether in the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal was right in reversing the findings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) relating to compliance of provisions of Section 11(1

MESERS SHRI SWAMI SHANKARNATH PARVAT CHARITABLE AND WELFARE TRUST ,KAPURTHALA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee appeal is allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 602/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: N.A.

Charitable or religious trust - Registration procedure - Assessment year 201011 - Whether while examining application seeking registration under section 12AA, manner of application of funds of trust do not fall within purview of Commissioner; Commissioner should only satisfy himself about genuineness of aims and objects of trust/institution and genuineness of its activities as enumerated in clause (b) of sub-section (1

M/S SANTOSH FOUNDATION ,RAMPURA PHUL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 11 depends on the application of such fund for the charitable activities by the trust only. Thus, the CIT(E) is empowered to satisfy himself only about two factors i.e. the objects of the trust and the genuineness of the activities of the trust or institution and such powers does not extend to the eligibility of the trust/institution

M/S BABA BANDA BAHADUR MEMORIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 66/Asr/2017 Assessment Year:2015-16

1) or has obtained registration at any time under section 12A as it stood before its amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996 (33 of 1996) and subsequently the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner is satisfied that the activities of such trust or institution are not genuine or are not being carried out in accordance with the objects

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable purposes, since it was for the benefit of only one religious community the provision of Section 13 (1) (b) would apply to deny it exemption under Section 11 of the Act. The above conclusion was legally flawed. It was contrary to the decision of the Supreme Court in Dawoodi Bohra Jamat (supra) which held that even where the trust

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

1 st day of June, 2007, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in relation to the income of such trust or institution from the assessment year ITA No. 651/JP/2013 Shree Shyam Mandir Committee vs. ACIT immediately following the financial year in which such application is made:] [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

1 st day of June, 2007, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in relation to the income of such trust or institution from the assessment year ITA No. 651/JP/2013 Shree Shyam Mandir Committee vs. ACIT immediately following the financial year in which such application is made:] [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust

M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

1 st day of June, 2007, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in relation to the income of such trust or institution from the assessment year ITA No. 651/JP/2013 Shree Shyam Mandir Committee vs. ACIT immediately following the financial year in which such application is made:] [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust

SH. VISHWA MITTER SEKHRI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,BATALA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), AMRITSAR.

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 75/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2007-08

1 st day of June, 2007, the provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall apply in relation to the income of such trust or institution from the assessment year ITA No. 651/JP/2013 Shree Shyam Mandir Committee vs. ACIT immediately following the financial year in which such application is made:] [Provided that where registration has been granted to the trust

MUKTISAR WELFARE CLUB,MUKTSAR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), MUKTSAR/, MUKTSAR,PUNJAB

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Hybrid Hearing) I.T.A. No. 182 & 235/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2024-25 Muktisar Welfare Club, Near Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Manga Petrol Pump Ajit Muktsar. Cinema Road, C/O Rinku Pharma Muktsar, Muktsar, Punjab. [Pan: Aadam2794B] (Respondent) (Appellant)

1-3 of Case Law PB) Section 12A, read with section 12AA, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Charitable or religious trust