MESERS SHRI SWAMI SHANKARNATH PARVAT CHARITABLE AND WELFARE TRUST ,KAPURTHALA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the assessee appeal is allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 602/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: N.A.

Charitable and Welfare Income Tax (Exemption), Trust, Nakodar Road, Hadiabad, Chandigarh Phagwara, Kapurthala. [PAN: AAUTS 4845H] (Respendent) (Appellant) Appellant by Written Submission Respondent by Sh. Sanjay Dhariwal, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 13.09.2021 Date of Pronouncement 21.09.2021 ORDER Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.09.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income

M/S SANTOSH FOUNDATION ,RAMPURA PHUL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Income Tax Act in the hands of the Company. In order to work around the provisions, M/s Stelco Ltd. has created a trust where the members are same as that of the parent/associated companies. This is a close arrangement whereby a corporate entity is notonly able to redeem its CSR obligation but also at the same time able to control

SANT MAHESH MUNI JI BOREWALE WELFARE SOCIETY,MOGA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTIONS) WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

income on commercial principles by invoking provisions of section 11 of the act in the case of trust and charitable institutions. The addition

M/S BABA BANDA BAHADUR MEMORIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FARIDKOT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 66/Asr/2017 Assessment Year:2015-16

income of any trust or institution unless various conditions are fulfilled. The power of the Commissioner to look into the objects of the Society and the genuineness of the same cannot be doubted when the basis is of non-supply of information. In such circumstances, it would be appropriate that the Commissioner undertakes the exercise afresh, on the basis

SH. VISHWA MITTER SEKHRI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,BATALA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION), AMRITSAR.

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 75/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2007-08

Charitable Society, Batala. through investigation/scrutiny to assess the escaped income of Rs. 1,03,75,360/- and any other income which subsequently comes to notice during the course of assessment proceedings.” 7. In response to notice u/s 148 the appellant replied that the return already filed may please be treated as return filed in response to notice

M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable and there was no change in activities of the assessee. In our view the assessee, though was registered on 25.9.2009, however the assessee, was entitled to the benefit of section 11, 12 and 13 of the income tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 under consideration in terms of the proviso to section 12 A of The Income

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable and there was no change in activities of the assessee. In our view the assessee, though was registered on 25.9.2009, however the assessee, was entitled to the benefit of section 11, 12 and 13 of the income tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 under consideration in terms of the proviso to section 12 A of The Income

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

charitable and there was no change in activities of the assessee. In our view the assessee, though was registered on 25.9.2009, however the assessee, was entitled to the benefit of section 11, 12 and 13 of the income tax Act for the assessment year 2007-08 under consideration in terms of the proviso to section 12 A of The Income

BHAG KAUR AND HARNAM SINGH ZORIA,DASUYA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

income. We thus while setting aside the orders of the authorities below in this regard direct the AO to delete the addition treating the assessee as registered trust with charitable

RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICE, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

income. Being aggrieved on the order of the ld. AO the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 5 ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The relief was granted related to addition of depreciation amount to Rs.44,10,065/- and amount to Rs.10,000/- for personal use of car and telephone

SH. RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

income. Being aggrieved on the order of the ld. AO the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 5 ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The relief was granted related to addition of depreciation amount to Rs.44,10,065/- and amount to Rs.10,000/- for personal use of car and telephone

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- (EXEMPTIONS)), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

income. Being aggrieved on the order of the ld. AO the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 5 ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The relief was granted related to addition of depreciation amount to Rs.44,10,065/- and amount to Rs.10,000/- for personal use of car and telephone

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

income. Being aggrieved on the order of the ld. AO the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 5 ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The relief was granted related to addition of depreciation amount to Rs.44,10,065/- and amount to Rs.10,000/- for personal use of car and telephone

SH. RAM SHARAN DASS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

income. Being aggrieved on the order of the ld. AO the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 5 ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The relief was granted related to addition of depreciation amount to Rs.44,10,065/- and amount to Rs.10,000/- for personal use of car and telephone

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

income. Being aggrieved on the order of the ld. AO the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 5 ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The relief was granted related to addition of depreciation amount to Rs.44,10,065/- and amount to Rs.10,000/- for personal use of car and telephone

M/S RAM SARAN DASS KISHORI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- (EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

income. Being aggrieved on the order of the ld. AO the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The I.T.A. No. 103/Asr/2014 & 6 ors 5 ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The relief was granted related to addition of depreciation amount to Rs.44,10,065/- and amount to Rs.10,000/- for personal use of car and telephone

SARFROSH FOUNDATION,MOGA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Charitable purposes since the impugned Trust have submitted due Audited Financial Statement for the year ended 31st March, 2021, 31.03.2022 and upto 31.12.2022 duly supported by Bills/Vouchers Sarfarosh Foundaton v. CIT supporting documents evidence amounts spent/incurred and no defects, whatsoever have been raised/pointed out in the impugned order denying registration/approval u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act. 3. That

SARFROSH FOUNDATION,MOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result, the both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Charitable purposes since the impugned Trust have submitted due Audited Financial Statement for the year ended 31st March, 2021, 31.03.2022 and upto 31.12.2022 duly supported by Bills/Vouchers Sarfarosh Foundaton v. CIT supporting documents evidence amounts spent/incurred and no defects, whatsoever have been raised/pointed out in the impugned order denying registration/approval u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act. 3. That