BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 302clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai349Delhi265Jaipur109Karnataka106Bangalore99Chennai90Ahmedabad75Kolkata59Hyderabad57Chandigarh44Pune16Indore15Surat14Rajkot13Nagpur12Visakhapatnam9Cochin6Lucknow4Raipur4Jodhpur3SC3Panaji2Agra2Amritsar2Patna2Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1Varanasi1Dehradun1Guwahati1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 41(1)5Section 683Section 1542Section 69A2Section 69B2Section 69C2Section 69D2Addition to Income2

M/S ACTIVE TOOLS (P). LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -II, JALANDHAR

ITA 260/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 115Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 154Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

302 (Ker) ………………. That without prejudice to our submission that provisions of section 154/155 of the Act are not attracted in this case since there is no glaring mistake apparent from records, there is no obvious ITA 260/Amr/2019 6 mistake of fact or law from the record and issue is not debatable. However reply to proposed rectification is being filed under

SHRI OM PARKASH LEGAL HEIAR SMT PUSHPA VERMA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(3), JALANDHAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 756/ASR/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Oct 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. No. 756/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 41(1)Section 41(1)(a)Section 68

302 ITR 246 (P&H), to the effect that once the net profit rate is applied for estimating income, no separate addition on account of cash credit, or for payment of purchases, could be made. He, however, fairly conceded that the said decision stands rendered without considering the decision in Devi Prasad Vishwanath Prasad (supra), so that