SHRI RANJEET SINGH,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 (1), BATHINDA
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed
ITA 91/ASR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Aug 2023AY 2016-17
Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee
For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Digvijai Chaudhary, Sr. DR
Section 96
capital gains of Rs.
26,62,987/-. Thereafter, the assessee revised the ITR on 27.05.2017
showing total income at Rs.3,39,360/- under the head income from other sources.
1.2 The assessee claimed the above stated amount of Rs.27,96,629/- i.e.,
Compensation of Rs. 21,51,253/- and Solatium @ 30% of Rs.6,45,376/- in the revised return
