SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR, PUNJAB vs. DCIT, ACIT CIRCLE 1, BATHINDA
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed
ITA 527/ASR/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar28 Feb 2025AY 2020-21
Bench: Shri Udayan Das Gupta & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 527/Asr/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21
For Appellant: S/Shri Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Shri K. Mehboob Ali Khan, CIT DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 80
10B(1)(C) regarding the application of the Cost-Pius Method
for determining the ALP. Additionally, the AR argued that the DRP
failed to add the mark-up, solely on the basis that the eligible and
non-eligible units belong to the same assessee, and therefore, there
is no incentive or mark-up over the cost of steam production.
During
