BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 89clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,174Delhi704Jaipur262Kolkata219Chennai201Bangalore129Ahmedabad124Karnataka101Hyderabad99Chandigarh82Surat77Pune61Cochin58Indore57Nagpur41Rajkot39Calcutta34Raipur34Guwahati30Visakhapatnam25Cuttack25Lucknow25Allahabad22Agra20Jodhpur8Patna6Telangana5Amritsar4Jabalpur3Ranchi2Dehradun1Varanasi1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 2633Section 1483Addition to Income3Bogus Purchases3Section 145(3)2Section 143(3)2Reopening of Assessment2

SHRI SHAM SUNDER AGGARWAL,KAPURTHALA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 17/ASR/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 263Section 263o

bogus. I.T.A. No.17/Asr/2021 10 Assessment Year: 2011-12 viii) One more point, important and relevant to part with, is that the assessee in that year, had a fleet of about 25 trucks of his own, besides a tractor trolley, (as evident from the schedule of fixed assets enclosed at Page 82), deployed to lift the stocks of rice husk from

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, AMRITSAR. vs. M/S. BISHAN STEEL INDUSTRIES, AMRITSAR.

In the result the appeal of the revenue as well as CO of the

ITA 589/ASR/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 250(6)

89,574/is sustained and remaining addition is deleted “ 2. Further Ld. DR had also drawn our attention to the order passed by the Assessing Officer, more particularly to the following paragraphs:- “When the counsel of the assessee was asked why details of trucks are not available in bills he could not provide any answer. From the details of trucks

MEASAGE BHAI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, MOGA

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 358/ASR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 44A

bogus purchases. Reliance has been placed on the following judgments: I. Judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of PCIT vs. Tejua Rohit Kumar Kapadia in SLP No. 12670/2018 reported in 94 taxmann.com 325 (SC) copy placed at pages 303 of judgment set. II. Judgment of Piyush Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT in ITA No. 5599/Del/2010 copy placed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. SHRI BHUPINDER SINGH. M/S NOVELTY SWEETS, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 196/ASR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 145(3)

bogus losses to be set off with the amount of surrendered income when it is a clear cut fact that accounts of the assessee were not maintained properly? 4. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law by not appreciating that the assessee had incurred losses in the relevant year only