BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai582Delhi396Jaipur120Karnataka99Kolkata92Bangalore80Ahmedabad70Cochin57Chennai49Chandigarh49Calcutta35Surat29Pune28Raipur26Indore25Lucknow25Guwahati17Nagpur15Visakhapatnam8Jodhpur8Rajkot6Patna6Hyderabad6Amritsar4Telangana4Agra3Cuttack3Ranchi2Allahabad2SC1Gauhati1Varanasi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1487Section 684Addition to Income4Section 250(6)3Section 143(3)3Reopening of Assessment2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, FARIDKOT, BSNL BUILDING vs. M/S VOHRA SOLVEX PVT. LTD, SADIQ ROAD

In the result, C.O. filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 588/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)Section 69C

section 68 solely on basis of information received from Investigation Wing that lenders from whom assessee-company acquired loans were indulged in bogus accommodation entries, since assessee was not granted an opportunity to cross-examine persons whose statements were recorded during Investigation, Impugned addition made on basis of such investigation which was not privy to assessee were to be deleted

INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 1 (2), BATHINDA vs. MESERS SHREE BHAGWATI COTTON TRADERS ,, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 479/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)Section 68

bogus purchased only the addition was made @ 1% of total purchased and rest of the amount was deletedby the ld. CIT(A). 5. Being aggrieved assessee& revenueboth filed an appeal before us. Adjudication of ITA No. 480/Asr/2018 6. The ld. Counsel of the assessee, Mr. Sudhir Sehgal vehemently argued and placed that the assessee is a trader of cotton

MESERS SHREE BHAGWATI COTTON TRADERS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 1 (2), BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 480/ASR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Oct 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)Section 68

bogus purchased only the addition was made @ 1% of total purchased and rest of the amount was deletedby the ld. CIT(A). 5. Being aggrieved assessee& revenueboth filed an appeal before us. Adjudication of ITA No. 480/Asr/2018 6. The ld. Counsel of the assessee, Mr. Sudhir Sehgal vehemently argued and placed that the assessee is a trader of cotton

SHRI DARPAN JAIN,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX WARD - 1(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is allowed

ITA 577/ASR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. J. S. Bhasin, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 147Section 36Section 68

purchase of land. As far as availability of opening balance of capital account is concerned, the same gets absorbed in the investment in fixed assets. The assessee has not filed fund flow to show how interest free funds were advanced for non-business use. The assessee has incurred interest expenditure on loans raised for business purposes. In view