NASA AGRO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,FAZILKA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 236/ASR/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2011-12
Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta
For Appellant: Sh. Y. K. Sud & Sh. P. K. Anand, CAs
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153cSection 250
purchases were bogus. In this case the appellant is able to show only paper trail and not establish that the goods have really moved. That paper trail gets busted once the supplier said that he had not supplied the goods.
There is no evidence of transport engaged by anyone. The supplier in fact is an accommodation entry provider provided bogus