BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 131(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,285Delhi770Jaipur296Kolkata275Bangalore147Ahmedabad133Karnataka103Chennai89Hyderabad67Surat64Chandigarh59Indore59Cochin57Pune57Nagpur52Raipur38Calcutta35Rajkot30Guwahati28Visakhapatnam21Lucknow21Cuttack17Agra10Jodhpur8Patna7Varanasi7Amritsar4Ranchi3Allahabad2Gauhati1Telangana1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)6Section 1445Section 1473Addition to Income3Section 145(3)2Bogus Purchases2

MESERS SUPERTECH FORGINGS(INDIA) PVT.LTD.,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE IV, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 563/ASR/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar02 Aug 2021AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 147

131 of the IT Act .on account of inability of the appellant to produce him for substantiating the claim of purchases made from that party. Shri Madan Lal Pahuja failed to attend the proceedings on account of his medical condition. The appellant has also failed to produce him even in the course of remand proceedings to substantiate its claim

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, FARIDKOT, BSNL BUILDING vs. M/S VOHRA SOLVEX PVT. LTD, SADIQ ROAD

In the result, C.O. filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 588/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal, A.R
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250(6)Section 69C

D. R. Date of Hearing : 20.03.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 29.04.2025 2 I.T.A. No. 588/Asr/2024 & Ors Vohra Solvex Pvt Ltd. v. ITO & Ors ORDER Per Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.: This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 03/09/2024 passed u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(2), JAMMU vs. SH. NEERAJ AGGARWAL , JAMMU

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 349/ASR/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar06 Aug 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 349/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Sh. Alok Kumar, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Sh. S. Krishnan (Adv.)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 80

131 dated 01.11.2012 and, again, vide show cause dated 12.02.2013, which was also accompanied by summons of even date. The AO’s finding as to the applicability of s. 145(3), which reads as under, and, thus, of s. 144, however, is not based only on the non-production of the books of account, indeed essential for him to complete

SH. VIKRAM JAIN,AMRITSAR. vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRITSAR.

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes on the terms afore-stated

ITA 336/ASR/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar01 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 336/Asr/2016 Assessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Sh. R. K. Magow (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 145(3)

1) or accounting standards as notified under sub-section (2), have not been regularly followed by the assessee, the Assessing Officer may make an assessment in the manner provided in section 144.’ That does not, however, mean that an assessment, where section 145(3) is invoked or becomes applicable, is an assessment u/s. 144. As such, nothing of consequence turns