NEERAJ KUMAR SETHI,DELHI vs. ITO, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC)
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 9/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2025AY 2014-15
Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta
For Appellant: Sh. Ashwani Kalia, C.A
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 250Section 68
bogus purchase and sale transactions ignoring the Fund Flow Statement as well as various case laws that in a situation like this only the extra margin of profit earned, if any, could be added.
5. That the Id. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the addition of Rs.1,98,47,645 made