BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai491Delhi424Bangalore264Kolkata126Hyderabad113Jaipur97Chennai96Patna79Chandigarh58Raipur46Visakhapatnam41Ahmedabad37Indore34Pune34Rajkot26Lucknow22Nagpur18Agra16Cochin16Panaji16Guwahati13Surat12Jodhpur11Allahabad7Ranchi5Amritsar4Varanasi4Dehradun2Jabalpur2Telangana1Karnataka1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)15Section 194H6Section 133A(1)4TDS4Survey u/s 133A4Section 402

MEASAGE POOJA FLOOR MILLS,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- TDS, AMRITSAR

ITA 370/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Jun 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri L. P. Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri P.N. Arora, Advocate (A.R)For Respondent: Shri Charan Dass,(D.R.)
Section 133A(1)Section 194HSection 201(1)

TDS, Amritsar, passed u/s 201(1)/2011(1A) dated 24.03.2016 thereby creating demand of Rs. 1,11,580/- is illegal, invalid and void abinitio and the same is liable to be cancelled. Similarly the worthy CIT(A) has erred in confirming the same. 5. That the authorities below did not appreciate that there was no liability u/s 201(1)/201

MEASAGE POOJA FLOOR MILLS ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), AMRITSAR

ITA 371/ASR/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
30 Jun 2020
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri L. P. Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri P.N. Arora, Advocate (A.R)For Respondent: Shri Charan Dass,(D.R.)
Section 133A(1)Section 194HSection 201(1)

TDS, Amritsar, passed u/s 201(1)/2011(1A) dated 24.03.2016 thereby creating demand of Rs. 1,11,580/- is illegal, invalid and void abinitio and the same is liable to be cancelled. Similarly the worthy CIT(A) has erred in confirming the same. 5. That the authorities below did not appreciate that there was no liability u/s 201(1)/201

MEASAGE POOJA FLOOR MILLS ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- TDS , AMRITSAR

ITA 369/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Jun 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri L. P. Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood

For Appellant: Shri P.N. Arora, Advocate (A.R)For Respondent: Shri Charan Dass,(D.R.)
Section 133A(1)Section 194HSection 201(1)

TDS, Amritsar, passed u/s 201(1)/2011(1A) dated 24.03.2016 thereby creating demand of Rs. 1,11,580/- is illegal, invalid and void abinitio and the same is liable to be cancelled. Similarly the worthy CIT(A) has erred in confirming the same. 5. That the authorities below did not appreciate that there was no liability u/s 201(1)/201

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BATHINDA vs. SH. MOHAN LAL, BATHINDA

ITA 170/ASR/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar03 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. T. S. Kapoor & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 170/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Pan: Aajpl8560B Income Tax Officer, Vs. Sh. Mohan Lal Prop. Ward-1(2), Bathinda. M/S Ramji Dass Bko, Vill. Bhagiwander, Tehsil Talwandi Sabo, Distt. Bathinda. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. S. S. Kanwal (D. R.)For Respondent: Sh. P. N. Arora (Adv.)
Section 133A(1)Section 194CSection 40Section 69C

TDS liability. Further, during the course of assessment proceedings, it was never contended by the assessee that the above persons were his regular employees and they make the payments to labourers on his behalf. Moreover, the assessee has not produced any documentary evidence in the shape of mustard rolls to substantiate his claim. 3. The appellant craves the leave