BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “TDS”+ Section 89(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,192Mumbai1,160Bangalore514Chennai439Kolkata235Indore165Hyderabad158Ahmedabad158Chandigarh155Jaipur128Karnataka124Raipur76Cochin75Pune55Cuttack43Rajkot36Lucknow35Surat33Nagpur33Visakhapatnam30Ranchi24Agra18Guwahati18Amritsar14Jodhpur13Telangana10Allahabad9Dehradun8Patna5Jabalpur5Varanasi5Uttarakhand3Rajasthan3SC3Panaji2Calcutta2Punjab & Haryana1Kerala1

Key Topics

Addition to Income11Section 143(3)8Section 2507Section 153A6Section 1396Section 1326Section 69A6Section 80P(2)(a)6Search & Seizure6TDS

THE JHINGRAN COOP MULTIPURPOSE SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAWANSHAHR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), JALANDHAR

ITA 64/ASR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Pardeep Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 80P

1. That the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFSC Delhi, is against law & facts of the case. 2. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi has erred in law & facts of the case in confirming the action of the ld. AO in treating the assessee in default for TDS to the tune of Rs.41

5
Section 2634
Exemption3

SHRI SUBASH GUPTA,JAMMU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 671/ASR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar25 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Joginder Singh, C. A
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 194Section 250Section 69

1,81,17,500/-for the purchase of property from M3M India Pvt. Ltd., reflected in Form 26AS. Despite multiple opportunities, the appellant failed to provide satisfactory explanations regarding the source of this investment. The AO, relying on the available material and in the absence of a credible explanation, invoked Section 69, treating the investment as unexplained and assessed

SHRI RANJEET SINGH,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 (1), BATHINDA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 91/ASR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir Sehgal Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Digvijai Chaudhary, Sr. DR
Section 96

section 96 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 cannot be given to the appellant from Long Term Capital Gains, arising from Compulsory Acquisition of Land under National Highway Act, 1956, while ignoring the contention of the assessee that the CIT(A) NFAC has allowed the exemption, on identical facts, in the case of Jaswinder Kaur Sahni, Bathinda; that ignored the contention

SH. SADA RAM CHAWLA,TARN TARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), TARNTARAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 479/ASR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Sh. Nipun Khanna, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mehra, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40a

1. That the Assessment Order passed by Ld. Assessing Officer u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is illegally, arbitrary and contrary to the facts on records and this illegality pervades over all other grounds of appeal. That the Worthy CIT(Appeals) further erred in confirming the decision of Ld. AO partially. 2 2. That the Ld AO & Worthy

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, AMRITSAR vs. M/S SURJIT SINGH AND CO, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is rejected

ITA 16/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 40A(3)

section 40A(3) of the Income Tax to the extent of Rs. 1,02,52,935/- on account of claim of payment of site charges/labour charges and, therefore, not allowable as deduction. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any ground of appeal.” 4. Briefly the facts are that the assessee is a civil contractor engaged in constructing

ITFAQ EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS), JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 98/ASR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 263

section 263 initiated against the assessee may please be dropped. Rejecting the above replies, the worthy CIT(E) has proceeded to issue an order u/s 263 setting aside the order of Ld. AO u/s 143(3). It is this order which the appellant assessee has assailed through this appeal. Your honors. Brief arguments in support of the appeal are: 1

MEASAGE BHAI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, MOGA

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 358/ASR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 44A

TDS and had duly deposited it as required. From the perusal of record it can be Very well worked out that there was actual movement of goods and that our client had actually production purchased the goods / wheat, which he had used for its The detail of all the purchases is as under: S. Bill Dated Amount Goods Vehicle

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI BHAVNOOR SINGH BEDI, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

ITA 87/ASR/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

89 to 90/Asr/2020 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2017-18 DCIT, Central Circle-1, Vs. Sh. Jatinder Singh Bedi, Jalandhar. 331, New Jawahar Nagar, Jalandhar. [PAN: AASPB0646B] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Ashray Sarna, CA Respondent by Sh. Balwinder Kaur, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 15.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement 11.04.2023 I.T.A. No.51/Asr/2020: A.Y.: 2014-15 I.T.A. No.53/Asr/2020

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI JATINDER SINGH BEDI, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

ITA 89/ASR/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

89 to 90/Asr/2020 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2017-18 DCIT, Central Circle-1, Vs. Sh. Jatinder Singh Bedi, Jalandhar. 331, New Jawahar Nagar, Jalandhar. [PAN: AASPB0646B] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Ashray Sarna, CA Respondent by Sh. Balwinder Kaur, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 15.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement 11.04.2023 I.T.A. No.51/Asr/2020: A.Y.: 2014-15 I.T.A. No.53/Asr/2020

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI JATINDER SINGH BEDI , JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

ITA 90/ASR/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

89 to 90/Asr/2020 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2017-18 DCIT, Central Circle-1, Vs. Sh. Jatinder Singh Bedi, Jalandhar. 331, New Jawahar Nagar, Jalandhar. [PAN: AASPB0646B] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Ashray Sarna, CA Respondent by Sh. Balwinder Kaur, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 15.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement 11.04.2023 I.T.A. No.51/Asr/2020: A.Y.: 2014-15 I.T.A. No.53/Asr/2020

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR vs. SHRI BHAVNOOR SINGH BEDI, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

ITA 88/ASR/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

89 to 90/Asr/2020 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2017-18 DCIT, Central Circle-1, Vs. Sh. Jatinder Singh Bedi, Jalandhar. 331, New Jawahar Nagar, Jalandhar. [PAN: AASPB0646B] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Ashray Sarna, CA Respondent by Sh. Balwinder Kaur, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 15.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement 11.04.2023 I.T.A. No.51/Asr/2020: A.Y.: 2014-15 I.T.A. No.53/Asr/2020

SHRI BHAVNOOR SINGH BEDI,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

ITA 53/ASR/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

89 to 90/Asr/2020 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2017-18 DCIT, Central Circle-1, Vs. Sh. Jatinder Singh Bedi, Jalandhar. 331, New Jawahar Nagar, Jalandhar. [PAN: AASPB0646B] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Ashray Sarna, CA Respondent by Sh. Balwinder Kaur, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 15.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement 11.04.2023 I.T.A. No.51/Asr/2020: A.Y.: 2014-15 I.T.A. No.53/Asr/2020

SHRI BHAVNOOR SINGH BEDI,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue, ITA No 90/Asr/2020 is dismissed

ITA 51/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 132Section 139Section 153ASection 250Section 69A

89 to 90/Asr/2020 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2017-18 DCIT, Central Circle-1, Vs. Sh. Jatinder Singh Bedi, Jalandhar. 331, New Jawahar Nagar, Jalandhar. [PAN: AASPB0646B] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Ashray Sarna, CA Respondent by Sh. Balwinder Kaur, CIT. DR Date of Hearing 15.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement 11.04.2023 I.T.A. No.51/Asr/2020: A.Y.: 2014-15 I.T.A. No.53/Asr/2020

MALWA CO-OP L & C SOCIETY LTD,MUKTSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-II(2), MUKTSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee ITA No

ITA 39/ASR/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Tarun Bansal, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 250(6)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(vi)

89,152/- and had determined net profit @ of 6% which was the same in both the assessments. The net profit was calculated amount to Rs.2,07,675/- on enhanced gross contract and tax was levied. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) uphold the order of the ld. AO related to enhancement