BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 80P(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai146Bangalore62Raipur52Pune34Delhi27Chennai24Ahmedabad23Kolkata21Visakhapatnam19Cochin14Surat13Jaipur12Lucknow9Nagpur9Jabalpur7Karnataka6Jodhpur4Chandigarh3Panaji3Amritsar2Indore2Rajkot1Hyderabad1Varanasi1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)6Section 2012Section 194A(3)(v)2Section 201(1)2Section 143(3)2Deduction2

THE JHINGRAN COOP MULTIPURPOSE SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAWANSHAHR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), JALANDHAR

ITA 64/ASR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Pardeep Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 80P

4. Facts as per records are that the appellant has paid interest exceeding Rs. 5,000/- to non-members/nominal member without deducting TDS. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO by observing that it is very clear in this regard under Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, that exemption of TDS provision

MALWA CO-OP L & C SOCIETY LTD,MUKTSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-II(2), MUKTSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee ITA No

ITA 39/ASR/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Tarun Bansal, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 250(6)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(vi)

4. The ld. DR vehemently argued and relied on the order of Revenue authorities. 5. We heard the rival submissions and relied on the documents available in the record. In its fact, that the gross receipt should be determined by allowing the reasonable deduction of the items like TDS, VAT, security letter cess and other deduction. Accordingly, the assessee made