BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 80G(5)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai92Delhi73Bangalore41Ahmedabad36Chandigarh27Kolkata18Chennai14Jaipur12Pune11Hyderabad9Indore9Lucknow7Rajkot6Surat4Amritsar3Jodhpur2Allahabad2SC2Agra2Ranchi1Cuttack1Dehradun1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6Section 1544Section 143(3)3Penalty3Section 50C2Section 2502Long Term Capital Gains2Short Term Capital Gains2Deduction2Set Off of Losses

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 548/ASR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 548/(Asr)/2016 Assessment Year: 2009-10

For Appellant: Sh. Tarun Bansal (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

ii) …….. (iii) in the cases referred to in clause (c) or clause (d), in addition to tax, if any, payable by him, a sum which shall not be less than, but which shall not exceed three times, the amount of tax sought to be evaded by reason of the concealment of particulars of his income or fringe benefits

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

2

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 561/ASR/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

5 kanals 8.53 marls not appurtenant to the feed mill unit, the AO is quite justified in computing separately net long term capital gain on the sale of the above parcel of land not appurtenant to the feed mill at Rs.2698636/- [Rs.2714500 less indexed cost of such land at Rs. 15864/- based on its cost price of Rs.3192/-] and thereby

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 284/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

5 kanals 8.53 marls not appurtenant to the feed mill unit, the AO is quite justified in computing separately net long term capital gain on the sale of the above parcel of land not appurtenant to the feed mill at Rs.2698636/- [Rs.2714500 less indexed cost of such land at Rs. 15864/- based on its cost price of Rs.3192/-] and thereby