Search: TDS | BharatTax

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 80G(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6 Section 1544 Section 143(3)3 Penalty3 Section 50C2 Section 2502 Long Term Capital Gains2 Short Term Capital Gains2 Deduction2 Set Off of Losses

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 561/ASR/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

TDS) [2011] 335 ITR 287 (Pat), relied by the Revenue, directory. Further, that where the consequence/s of the breach of the time limit is not provided, the same is directory, is part of well-settled law, as explained by the Hon’ble Orissa High Court in Bhakta Vedanta Swami Charitable Trust v. CIT (in WP(C) 12347 of 2005 dated

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU