Search: TDS | BharatTax

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 50C(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai76 Delhi49 Bangalore13 Chennai11 Ahmedabad11 Guwahati9 Jaipur8 Chandigarh8 Kolkata8 Hyderabad5 Indore4 Lucknow4 Surat4 Agra3 Nagpur3 Pune3 Rajkot2 Jodhpur2 Jabalpur2 Visakhapatnam2 Amritsar2 Raipur1 Patna1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 1544 Section 143(3)2 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 50C2 Section 2502 Long Term Capital Gains2 Short Term Capital Gains2 Deduction2 Penalty2 Set Off of Losses

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 561/ASR/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

50C could not have been invoked as a sale was a composite sale. (b) The land sold was appurtenant to the feed mill, and not, as stated, not appurtenant thereto, so that the capital gain could not be separately computed. Qua the first issue, the ld. CIT(A) held that the issue being now raised was not the subject matter

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT