Search: TDS | BharatTax

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 43Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai34 Delhi30 Chennai26 Hyderabad18 Ahmedabad9 Visakhapatnam7 Kolkata7 Bangalore6 Pune4 Amritsar3 Jaipur3 Cochin2 Cuttack2 Karnataka1 Surat1 Telangana1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 406 Section 40A(3)4 Section 32(1)4 Section 684 Section 250(6)3 Section 43D3 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 143(3)2 Section 36(1)(iii)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-IV,, PATHANKOT vs. THE GURDASPUR CENTRAL CO. OPBANK LTD, GURDASPUR

In the result, the ground no

ITA 542/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meenaandsh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 40Section 43D

section 43D. iv. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld.CIT(A) has wrongly deleted the addition of Rs.2,00,00,000/- on account of Provision for Gratuity and Leave Salary without appreciating the fact that these were not ascertainable liabilities during the year under consideration.” 2. The assessee has taken the following additional ground: “ADDITIONAL

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, JAMMU vs. M/S. CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CO,, JAMMU ( J&K)

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as well as the appeal filed the Revenue Department is dismissed and Cross Objection also stands disposed off

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-IV,, PATHANKOT vs. THE GURDASPUR CENTRAL CO. OPBANK LTD, GURDASPUR

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, JAMMU vs. M/S. CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CO,, JAMMU ( J&K)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-IV,, PATHANKOT vs. THE GURDASPUR CENTRAL CO. OPBANK LTD, GURDASPUR

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, JAMMU vs. M/S. CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CO,, JAMMU ( J&K)

M/S. CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CO.,,JAMMU vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (HQRS), JAMMU