BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “TDS”+ Section 40aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi557Mumbai539Chennai270Bangalore240Kolkata229Hyderabad69Jaipur59Ahmedabad57Indore46Pune34Raipur32Chandigarh30Rajkot26Visakhapatnam25Lucknow19Surat19Cuttack19Patna14Guwahati13Jodhpur12Cochin12Nagpur11Amritsar10Karnataka7Agra5Ranchi4Dehradun4Varanasi4Calcutta3Jabalpur3Allahabad2SC1Telangana1Panaji1

Key Topics

Addition to Income10Disallowance9Section 40A(2)(b)8Section 40A(3)7Section 143(3)6TDS6Section 405Section 40A(2)4Deduction4Section 43D

BRIGHT ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD,JALANDHAR vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the Appeals are partly allowed

ITA 65/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 145Section 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

Section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act. During the assessment proceedings it was the contention of the Assessee that on account of taking the skilled and technical services of M/s Oxbridge International Private Limited, the expenditure on repair to building and plant and machinery have been reduced from Rs.3.53 Crore to Rs.2 Crore for the assessment year

MESERS BRIGHT ENTERPRISES PVT.LTD,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the Appeals are partly allowed

3
Section 194H3
Depreciation3
ITA 169/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
16 Aug 2021
AY 2014-15

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 145Section 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

Section 40A(2) of the Income Tax Act. During the assessment proceedings it was the contention of the Assessee that on account of taking the skilled and technical services of M/s Oxbridge International Private Limited, the expenditure on repair to building and plant and machinery have been reduced from Rs.3.53 Crore to Rs.2 Crore for the assessment year

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, AMRITSAR vs. M/S SURJIT SINGH AND CO, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is rejected

ITA 16/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 40A(3)

section 40A(3) of the Income Tax to the extent of Rs. 1,02,52,935/- on account of claim of payment of site charges/labour charges and, therefore, not allowable as deduction. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any ground of appeal.” 4. Briefly the facts are that the assessee is a civil contractor engaged in constructing

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

In the result the ground no

ITA 324/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(3)

section 40A(3). The ld. Counsel argued & placed the fact that assessee having factory in remote area in village Bholuwal, where no banking facility is available. In additional evidence the assessee has filed Certificate of Panchayat with English version & Affidavit of director of company which are enclosed as Page 31-33 of Paper book. By the additional evidence

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

In the result the ground no

ITA 325/ASR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(3)

section 40A(3). The ld. Counsel argued & placed the fact that assessee having factory in remote area in village Bholuwal, where no banking facility is available. In additional evidence the assessee has filed Certificate of Panchayat with English version & Affidavit of director of company which are enclosed as Page 31-33 of Paper book. By the additional evidence

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-IV,, PATHANKOT vs. THE GURDASPUR CENTRAL CO. OPBANK LTD, GURDASPUR

In the result, the ground no

ITA 542/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meenaandsh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 40Section 43D

TDS are not attracted on the supply of pamphlets, banners and other stationery items to the assessee as the same does not fall in the definition of “work” by virtue of sub clause (e) of clause (iv) of the explanation of section 194C. The disallowance of Rs 34,90,828/- u/s 40a

SH. AMRINDER SINGH DHIMAN,NAKODAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE PHAGWARA, PHAGWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 584/ASR/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar25 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Trilochan Singh PS Khalsa, Sr DR
Section 40

TDS and again vide reply dated 20.11.2012, stated that the said exemption certificate was not being sent. In the absence of the said exemption certificate, the assessee was duty bound to deduct tax at the time of payment. c. Section 40a

DE vs. ON PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMMUVS.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JAMMU

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 204/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Vijay Dewan, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Ghansham Sharma, Sr. DR

40A(2) whereas in the present case, the issue is claim of payment of sales commission against sales incentives paid as part of salary package to the employees of the assessee company without deducting TDS. 8. Similarly, the judgement given by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Devson Pvt. Ltd. v. Asstt./Dy.CIT “S.A Builders

DE vs. ON PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMMUVS.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2, JAMMU

In the result, both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 549/ASR/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Vijay Dewan, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Ghansham Sharma, Sr. DR

40A(2) whereas in the present case, the issue is claim of payment of sales commission against sales incentives paid as part of salary package to the employees of the assessee company without deducting TDS. 8. Similarly, the judgement given by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Devson Pvt. Ltd. v. Asstt./Dy.CIT “S.A Builders

SH. SADA RAM CHAWLA,TARN TARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), TARNTARAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 479/ASR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

For Appellant: Sh. Nipun Khanna, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mehra, D.R
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40a

section 194H and since no tax was deducted by disallowing the same u/s. 40a(ia) whereas the Appellant is not having any payer and payee relationship with the retailers as retailers are not providing any services to the company and not to the appellant. The Appellant is only transferring/redistributing money received from Reliance as per their directions 3. That