Search: TDS | BharatTax

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 277clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26310 Section 143(3)8 Section 271(1)(c)7 Section 2744 TDS2 Depreciation2 Penalty2 Addition to Income2

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 548/ASR/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 548/(Asr)/2016 Assessment Year: 2009-10

For Appellant: Sh. Tarun Bansal (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)

Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

277 (SC) and Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills [2009] 8 Scale 231.’ The matter was also examined, arriving though at the same conclusion, by the Hon'ble High Court in CIT v. Rampur Engineering Co. Ltd. [2009] 309 ITR 143(Del)(FB), which decision stands also explained in Madhushree Gupta & Ors. (supra) (refer paras 62 and 63 read with para

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

NARINDER AND COMPANY,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(5), JALANDHAR

M/S KASHMIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

NARINDER AND COMPANY,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(5), JALANDHAR

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA