Search: TDS | BharatTax

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 275(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2506 Section 143(3)4 Section 2(22)(e)4 Section 40A(3)4 Addition to Income4 Section 44A3 Section 36(1)(iii)2 Section 362 Deemed Dividend2 Depreciation

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

In the result the ground no

ITA 324/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(3)

TDS under section 194-C is not applicable in this case as no oral or written agreement or contract was there. 7.1. Mr Singla has respectfully relied on judgement of High Court of Punjab and Haryanain the case of Commissioner of Income-tax, Chandigarhv.BhagwatiSteels[2011] 198 Taxman 275 (Punjab & Haryana); “Re: Question No. 1

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

AARCON INDIA,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 5 (1), AMRITSAR

MESERS G.G CONTINEENTAL TRADES PVT.LTD,BATHINDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-I, BATHINDA

MEASAGE G. G OILS & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,BATHINDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- 1 , BATHINDA