MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

In the result the ground no

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in brevity the Act) for A.Ys. 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orderswere originated from the order of the ld. Income Tax Officer, I.T.A. Nos. 323 to 325/Asr/2019 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2014-15 to 2015-16 2 Ward-3(2) Ferozepur, (in brevity the AO). The orders were passed

SHRI SANTOKH SINGH ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 2 (1), AMRITSAR

The appeals of the assessees are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250(6) on account of failure of the appellant to respond to notices dated 11.10.2022 and 15.11.2022 without adjudicating the case on merits. 9.2 BENEFIT OF EXEPENSES NOT GIVEN AND HAS ERRED IN APPLYING COMMISSION RATE OF 5% a) That the Ld. AO has failed to appreciate that the total amount withdrawn was consumed for making payment in respect

SHRI SANTOKH SINGH ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 2 (1), AMRITSAR

The appeals of the assessees are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250(6) on account of failure of the appellant to respond to notices dated 11.10.2022 and 15.11.2022 without adjudicating the case on merits. 9.2 BENEFIT OF EXEPENSES NOT GIVEN AND HAS ERRED IN APPLYING COMMISSION RATE OF 5% a) That the Ld. AO has failed to appreciate that the total amount withdrawn was consumed for making payment in respect

SHRI SANTOKH SINGH ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 2 (1), AMRITSAR

The appeals of the assessees are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250(6) on account of failure of the appellant to respond to notices dated 11.10.2022 and 15.11.2022 without adjudicating the case on merits. 9.2 BENEFIT OF EXEPENSES NOT GIVEN AND HAS ERRED IN APPLYING COMMISSION RATE OF 5% a) That the Ld. AO has failed to appreciate that the total amount withdrawn was consumed for making payment in respect

SHRI SANTOKH SINGH ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -2 (1), AMRITSAR

The appeals of the assessees are disposed of in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250(6) on account of failure of the appellant to respond to notices dated 11.10.2022 and 15.11.2022 without adjudicating the case on merits. 9.2 BENEFIT OF EXEPENSES NOT GIVEN AND HAS ERRED IN APPLYING COMMISSION RATE OF 5% a) That the Ld. AO has failed to appreciate that the total amount withdrawn was consumed for making payment in respect

SHRI HARINDER PAL SINGH,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Y. 2015-16.The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. Joint I.T.A. No.123/Asr/2022 2 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) Central Circle-1, Jalandhar,(in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 154 of the Act date of order 26.02.2021. The assessee took

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),FEROZEPUR, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2017-18 Ito, Ward-3(1), Vs. M/S Jatin Agro Fort Road, Ferozepur. 152-P, Ferozepur. [Pan:-Aarpm5393F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Ashray Sarna, Ca Appellant By Respondent By Sh. Sunil Gautam, Cit. Dr

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,( henceforth the Act ) both dated 29.01.2024 , which has emanated from the orders of AO, Circle Ferozepur, dated 30.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act (for A.Y. 2014- 15) and order dated 28.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act ( for AY 2017-18 ). I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/202 Assessment Years

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2017-18 Ito, Ward-3(1), Vs. M/S Jatin Agro Fort Road, Ferozepur. 152-P, Ferozepur. [Pan:-Aarpm5393F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Ashray Sarna, Ca Appellant By Respondent By Sh. Sunil Gautam, Cit. Dr

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,( henceforth the Act ) both dated 29.01.2024 , which has emanated from the orders of AO, Circle Ferozepur, dated 30.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act (for A.Y. 2014- 15) and order dated 28.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act ( for AY 2017-18 ). I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/202 Assessment Years

MESAGE. NORTHERN TRASFORMERS. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA 329/Asr/2019 is partly

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250(6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Y. 2007-08.The impugned order was originated against the order of the Income Tax Officer, Ward- I.T.A. No.329/Asr/2019 2 2, Srinagar (in brevity the AO), order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, date of order 21.12.2009. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee

GURU NANAK DEV HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTIONS,), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Ys. 2010-11 to 2012-13.The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. I.T.A. No.173/Asr/2017 & I.T.A. No.608 to 610/Asr/2019 2 Income Tax Officer, (Exemption)- Jalandhar the order passed u/s 143(3)& 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2. In the outset, we advert that

GURU NANAK DEV HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Ys. 2010-11 to 2012-13.The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. I.T.A. No.173/Asr/2017 & I.T.A. No.608 to 610/Asr/2019 2 Income Tax Officer, (Exemption)- Jalandhar the order passed u/s 143(3)& 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2. In the outset, we advert that

GURU NANAK DEV HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD (EXEMPTION), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Ys. 2010-11 to 2012-13.The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. I.T.A. No.173/Asr/2017 & I.T.A. No.608 to 610/Asr/2019 2 Income Tax Officer, (Exemption)- Jalandhar the order passed u/s 143(3)& 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2. In the outset, we advert that

GURU NANAK DEV HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for A.Ys. 2010-11 to 2012-13.The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. I.T.A. No.173/Asr/2017 & I.T.A. No.608 to 610/Asr/2019 2 Income Tax Officer, (Exemption)- Jalandhar the order passed u/s 143(3)& 271(1)(c) of the Act. 2. In the outset, we advert that

SH.RAMESH KUMAR MAHAJAN,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act 1961, [in brevity the Act] for I.T.A. No.147/Asr/2019 2 Assessment Year: 2011-12 A.Y. 2011-12.The impugned order is emanated from the order of the ld. Income Tax Officer (TDS), Srinagar, (in brevity the AO) order passed u/s 206C (1) r.w.s. 6A/7 of the Act date of order 05.05.2016. 2. The assessee has filed

SHRI SUBASH GUPTA,JAMMU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has emanated from the order of the AO, NFAC, Delhi u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act, 1961 dated 24.08.2021. 2 I.T.A. No. 671/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 2. The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in form 36 are as follows: “1. That on the facts and circumstances

INDERJIT SINGH,PHAGWARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, PHAGAWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Brajesh Kumar Singh

250 of the Income Tax Act,1961 dated 25.04.2024which has arisen from the order of the AO, CPC, Bengaluru dated 17.12.2020 passed u/s 154of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2 I.T.A. No. 369/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 2. The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in Form No. 36 are as follows: “1. That on facts and circumstances

DIRECTOR PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY FRUIT RESEARCH ,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), JALNDHAR

250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as the ‘Act’) as per the details given below, whereby the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeals of the Assessee filed against orders/intimations u/s 200A of the Act. ITA N0s. 130 to 135/Asr/ 2019 2 (A.Ys.2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Director Punjab Agricultural Uni. Vs ITO (TDS

DIRECTOR PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY FRUIT RESEARCH,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), JALANDHAR

250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as the ‘Act’) as per the details given below, whereby the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeals of the Assessee filed against orders/intimations u/s 200A of the Act. ITA N0s. 130 to 135/Asr/ 2019 2 (A.Ys.2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) Director Punjab Agricultural Uni. Vs ITO (TDS