SANT SOLDIER ENGINEERS AND CONTRCTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .CPC-TDS, GHAZIBAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee through in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

TDS, 378 Lajpat Nagar, Jalandhar, Ghaziabad Aayakar Bhavan, Punjab – 144 001 Sector-3, Vaishali, [PAN: AAHCS 0525L] Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201010 (Assessee) (Revenue) Assessee by Sh. Abhinav Vijh, C. A. Revenue by Sh. S. M. Surendranath, D. R. Date of Hearing 30.11.2021 Date of Pronouncement 03.12.2021 ORDER Per Bench: These appeals are filed by the assessees feeling aggrieved

SANT SOLDIER ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee through in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

TDS, 378 Lajpat Nagar, Jalandhar, Ghaziabad Aayakar Bhavan, Punjab – 144 001 Sector-3, Vaishali, [PAN: AAHCS 0525L] Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201010 (Assessee) (Revenue) Assessee by Sh. Abhinav Vijh, C. A. Revenue by Sh. S. M. Surendranath, D. R. Date of Hearing 30.11.2021 Date of Pronouncement 03.12.2021 ORDER Per Bench: These appeals are filed by the assessees feeling aggrieved

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),FEROZEPUR, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2017-18 Ito, Ward-3(1), Vs. M/S Jatin Agro Fort Road, Ferozepur. 152-P, Ferozepur. [Pan:-Aarpm5393F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Ashray Sarna, Ca Appellant By Respondent By Sh. Sunil Gautam, Cit. Dr

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,( henceforth the Act ) both dated 29.01.2024 , which has emanated from the orders of AO, Circle Ferozepur, dated 30.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act (for A.Y. 2014- 15) and order dated 28.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act ( for AY 2017-18 ). I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/202 Assessment Years

INCOME TAX OFFICER, FEROZEPUR vs. MS.JATIN AGRO, FORT ROAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2017-18 Ito, Ward-3(1), Vs. M/S Jatin Agro Fort Road, Ferozepur. 152-P, Ferozepur. [Pan:-Aarpm5393F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Ashray Sarna, Ca Appellant By Respondent By Sh. Sunil Gautam, Cit. Dr

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,( henceforth the Act ) both dated 29.01.2024 , which has emanated from the orders of AO, Circle Ferozepur, dated 30.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act (for A.Y. 2014- 15) and order dated 28.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act ( for AY 2017-18 ). I.T.A. No. 103 & 104/Asr/202 Assessment Years

SPARROW SECURITY SERVICES ,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250(6) of the Income Tax Act, is bad in law as the same has been disposed off without examining the merits of the case. 3. That the CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 4807613/- on account of employer and employee contribution paid after the due date as per statute by not appreciating that the same

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY ,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS) , SRINAGAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) 2. The Ld. AR requested condonation of the Delay of 311 days explaining the reasons for delay in written application which reads as under: “2. The appellant being the DDO had never before received the order under section 250

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) 2. The Ld. AR requested condonation of the Delay of 311 days explaining the reasons for delay in written application which reads as under: “2. The appellant being the DDO had never before received the order under section 250

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY ,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) 2. The Ld. AR requested condonation of the Delay of 311 days explaining the reasons for delay in written application which reads as under: “2. The appellant being the DDO had never before received the order under section 250

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in brevity the Act) for assessment year 2015-16. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the ld. CPC-TDS, (in brevity the ld. AO) order passed u/s 200A of the Act. 2. The assessee has taken the following grounds: I.T.A. No. 189/Asr/2022 2 Assessment Year: 2015-16 “1. THE LATE

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

In the result the ground no

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in brevity the Act) for A.Ys. 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orderswere originated from the order of the ld. Income Tax Officer, I.T.A. Nos. 323 to 325/Asr/2019 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2014-15 to 2015-16 2 Ward-3(2) Ferozepur, (in brevity the AO). The orders were passed

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

In the result the ground no

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

250 (6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in brevity the Act) for A.Ys. 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2015-16. The impugned orderswere originated from the order of the ld. Income Tax Officer, I.T.A. Nos. 323 to 325/Asr/2019 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2014-15 to 2015-16 2 Ward-3(2) Ferozepur, (in brevity the AO). The orders were passed

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS,JK BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS vs. ITO (TDS), SRINAGAR, ITO (TDS), SRINAGAR

In the result, both the captioned appeals of the assessees are allowed for

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing)

section 250 of the 4 I.T.A. No. 237 & 238/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2012-13 and 2013-14 Income Tax Act common 1961, during the proceedings. Under the circumstances, he was compelled to believe that appellant has nothing to submit against the addition made by the assessing officer and same was confirmed. In our view, the act of the Addl

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS,JK BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS vs. ITO (TDS), SRINAGAR, SILK FACTORY ROAD SRINAGAR

In the result, both the captioned appeals of the assessees are allowed for

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta(Physical Hearing)

section 250 of the 4 I.T.A. No. 237 & 238/Asr/2025 Assessment Year: 2012-13 and 2013-14 Income Tax Act common 1961, during the proceedings. Under the circumstances, he was compelled to believe that appellant has nothing to submit against the addition made by the assessing officer and same was confirmed. In our view, the act of the Addl

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER FLORICULTURE,SRINAGAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) Floriculture, Radio Colony Srinagar Rajbagh Srinagar, 190008, Jammu & Kashmir [TAN: AMRE 10520G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Mohd. Iqbal Untoo, CA Respondent by: Ms. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 26.09.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.10.2022 ORDER Per Bench: These bunch of appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order even dated 25.08.2021 passed by the Commissioner

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER FLORICULTURE,SRI NAGAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC( TDS), SRINAGAR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) Floriculture, Radio Colony Srinagar Rajbagh Srinagar, 190008, Jammu & Kashmir [TAN: AMRE 10520G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Mohd. Iqbal Untoo, CA Respondent by: Ms. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 26.09.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.10.2022 ORDER Per Bench: These bunch of appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order even dated 25.08.2021 passed by the Commissioner

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER FLORICULTURE,SRINAGAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF NCOME TAX CPC ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) Floriculture, Radio Colony Srinagar Rajbagh Srinagar, 190008, Jammu & Kashmir [TAN: AMRE 10520G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Mohd. Iqbal Untoo, CA Respondent by: Ms. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 26.09.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.10.2022 ORDER Per Bench: These bunch of appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order even dated 25.08.2021 passed by the Commissioner

EXEXECUTIVE ENGINEER FLORICULTURE ,SRI NAGAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC (TDS), SRI NAGAR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) Floriculture, Radio Colony Srinagar Rajbagh Srinagar, 190008, Jammu & Kashmir [TAN: AMRE 10520G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Mohd. Iqbal Untoo, CA Respondent by: Ms. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 26.09.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.10.2022 ORDER Per Bench: These bunch of appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order even dated 25.08.2021 passed by the Commissioner

EXEXECUTIVE ENGINEER FLORICULTURE ,SRI NAGAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC ( TDS ), SRINAGAR

Appeals are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) Floriculture, Radio Colony Srinagar Rajbagh Srinagar, 190008, Jammu & Kashmir [TAN: AMRE 10520G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Mohd. Iqbal Untoo, CA Respondent by: Ms. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 26.09.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.10.2022 ORDER Per Bench: These bunch of appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order even dated 25.08.2021 passed by the Commissioner