GURU NANAK DEV HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTIONS,), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

244/- and has declared excess of income over expenditure amounting to Rs 23,83,252/-. From the perusal of MOA of the assessee society it was found that all the objects are related to multiple activities and not solely for imparting of education. Society's activities as per objectives include non-educational purposes also. However, As per section

GURU NANAK DEV HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

244/- and has declared excess of income over expenditure amounting to Rs 23,83,252/-. From the perusal of MOA of the assessee society it was found that all the objects are related to multiple activities and not solely for imparting of education. Society's activities as per objectives include non-educational purposes also. However, As per section

SHRI KANAV KHANNA,,AMRITSAR. vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, AMRITSAR.

In the result, the ground no- G of appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS was allowed and approved both by the A O and by the Commissioner. Such illegal action of the A O is the subject matter of challenge in the present appeal. 2. The appellant had claimed in the return exemption from tax on long-term Capital Gain of Rs. 8,32,58,783/- in respect of the agricultural land which

MEASAGE POOJA FLOOR MILLS ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), AMRITSAR

Bench: Shri L. P. Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood

section (1) of Sec. 201 of the Act. In the backdrop of his aforesaid contentions, it was averred by the Ld. A.R that taking cognizance of the fact that the respective payees had P a g e | 4 ITA No. 369-371/Asr./2019 A.Ys. 2013-14 to-2015-16 M/s Puja Flour Mills Vs. ITO already paid

MEASAGE POOJA FLOOR MILLS ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- TDS , AMRITSAR

Bench: Shri L. P. Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood

section (1) of Sec. 201 of the Act. In the backdrop of his aforesaid contentions, it was averred by the Ld. A.R that taking cognizance of the fact that the respective payees had P a g e | 4 ITA No. 369-371/Asr./2019 A.Ys. 2013-14 to-2015-16 M/s Puja Flour Mills Vs. ITO already paid

MEASAGE POOJA FLOOR MILLS,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- TDS, AMRITSAR

Bench: Shri L. P. Sahu & Shri Ravish Sood

section (1) of Sec. 201 of the Act. In the backdrop of his aforesaid contentions, it was averred by the Ld. A.R that taking cognizance of the fact that the respective payees had P a g e | 4 ITA No. 369-371/Asr./2019 A.Ys. 2013-14 to-2015-16 M/s Puja Flour Mills Vs. ITO already paid

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. No. 131/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13

section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter) for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 vide order dated 17.7.2015. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the assessee, a firm in the business of sale and service of vehicles, returned its’ income for the year on 30/9/2012 at Rs.2625, setting off brought forward